2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of computer simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model

Abstract: Performance on the carotid stenting simulator correlated with previous endovascular experience. Although both novice and advanced groups improved their time after a 30-minute to 60-minute proctored training session, improvement in the novice group was greater than that in the advanced group, which suggests that novices may benefit disproportionately from this type of training.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing VIST to simulate cerebral angiography 12,38 and CAS (including in 1 randomized controlled study) 9,18 resulted in improvements in anatomical and procedural knowledge, 12 faculty assessment of technical skills, 12 time taken to complete the procedure, 9,12,18,38 duration of fluoroscopy exposure, 9,12,38 contrast volume administered, 38 and catheter handling errors. 38 The ANGIO Mentor was used to simulate CAS 52 and diagnostic cerebral angiography 47 with evidence of significantly improved performance following training.…”
Section: Data Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing VIST to simulate cerebral angiography 12,38 and CAS (including in 1 randomized controlled study) 9,18 resulted in improvements in anatomical and procedural knowledge, 12 faculty assessment of technical skills, 12 time taken to complete the procedure, 9,12,18,38 duration of fluoroscopy exposure, 9,12,38 contrast volume administered, 38 and catheter handling errors. 38 The ANGIO Mentor was used to simulate CAS 52 and diagnostic cerebral angiography 47 with evidence of significantly improved performance following training.…”
Section: Data Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article stresses the importance of residents and faculty in mentoring medical students, as these interactions may have the strongest influence on future career choice. This study 11 evaluated baseline endovascular skills for novice and experienced participants using the Vascular Intervention Simulation Trainer (VIST). At baseline, 92% of the experienced group successfully completed the pretest as compared to 63% of novice participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a catheter-based endovascular simulator model (VIST-VR) Hsu et al [25] measured time to perform a carotid stent procedure, along with a series of other objective measures, although time was the only significant discriminator. Although time might be a surrogate measure of technical ability, it cannot alone be a discriminator of quality.…”
Section: Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some claims of construct validity for simulatorgenerated assessments have used metrics based, for example, on idiosyncratic opinion (e.g. ''catheter dragging'' in the aortic arch) or high-level events (procedure/ fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, end product) [25][26][27], although other workers dispute the relevance of such metrics [30,31]. Observer-based assessments could overcome technical shortcomings in using computational metrics within simulations, although adopting even validated surgical assessment tools might lose relevance when applied to simulated IR tasks.…”
Section: Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%