2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-1834-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of sentinel lymph node detection in early stages of cervical cancer

Abstract: SLN surgical biopsy based on lymphoscintigraphy and blue dye is a feasible and useful technique to avoid lymph node dissection in the early stages of cervical cancer. It has a high negative predictive value, can be incorporated into clinical routine (laparoscopy or open surgery) and is close to achieving validation in this setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SN procedure. SN procedure was performed in accordance with previous studies using combined radiocolloid and colorimetric technique [7,9,12,13]. The position of each SN relative to the major pelvic vessels, and the count rate, were recorded.…”
Section: Patients and Methods Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SN procedure. SN procedure was performed in accordance with previous studies using combined radiocolloid and colorimetric technique [7,9,12,13]. The position of each SN relative to the major pelvic vessels, and the count rate, were recorded.…”
Section: Patients and Methods Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the remaining studies, the full text was read. Finally, a total of 17 studies were included in the analysis, involving a total of 1,112 patients (5,6,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). The study selection process is summarized in Fig.…”
Section: Study Selection and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,9,28,34,39,40 Twenty-one of the thirty-seven SLN studies reviewed during the preparation of this series reported a 0% false negative rate. [1][2][3][4]6,7,11,12,17,18,21,22,26,27,29,31,32,36,40,42,44 In the remaining 12 studies, in which the issue of the false negative rate was addressed, the reported false negative rate ranged from 2.8% to 37%. 5,8,16,20,23,24,28,30,34,35,37,39 The widely ranging false negative rates in these studies (0% to 37% overall) are most likely reflections of the variation in SLN identification technique and the variation in the histopathologic examination of the SLNs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…33,45 The feasibility of SLN identification in cervical carcinoma has been well documented. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][9][10][11][12][13][16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][34][35][36][37]39,40,[42][43][44] The majority of these studies have focused on the clinical process of SLN identification and the predictive value of the SLN result. Many of these series have been relatively small with a tendency to include all types of cervical carcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%