“…5,9,28,34,39,40 Twenty-one of the thirty-seven SLN studies reviewed during the preparation of this series reported a 0% false negative rate. [1][2][3][4]6,7,11,12,17,18,21,22,26,27,29,31,32,36,40,42,44 In the remaining 12 studies, in which the issue of the false negative rate was addressed, the reported false negative rate ranged from 2.8% to 37%. 5,8,16,20,23,24,28,30,34,35,37,39 The widely ranging false negative rates in these studies (0% to 37% overall) are most likely reflections of the variation in SLN identification technique and the variation in the histopathologic examination of the SLNs.…”