2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2010.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User acceptance of wireless technology in organizations: A comparison of alternative models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, it is possible that a technology might be used because it enhances an individual's performance, not because the individual holds a positive attitude towards it. A more parsimonious version of TAM (TAM2) was thus proposed in which the attitude construct was removed (Wu, Cheng, Yen, & Huang, 2011) and additional constructs could be incorporated (Turner et al, 2010). This model supports the premise that people intend to use a technology for reasons other than having favourable attitudes towards it.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, it is possible that a technology might be used because it enhances an individual's performance, not because the individual holds a positive attitude towards it. A more parsimonious version of TAM (TAM2) was thus proposed in which the attitude construct was removed (Wu, Cheng, Yen, & Huang, 2011) and additional constructs could be incorporated (Turner et al, 2010). This model supports the premise that people intend to use a technology for reasons other than having favourable attitudes towards it.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The model posits that two types of user beliefs, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of the technology, are the most important factors determining a system's usage (Legris, Ingham, & Collerette, 2003). According to the model, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness influence an individual's intention to adopt the technology (Turner et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2011), with intention, in turn, influencing actual use (Dybå, Moe, & Arisholm, 2005). A technology is perceived to be useful if the user believes the system can improve or facilitate their performance during a task, while its perceived ease of use depends on the user believing that minimal effort is required to use the system (Wu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown by previous studies (Joo and Sang 2013) that the PEOU can considerably and directly influence the usage of a technology. The findings of other studies (Venkatesh and Bala 2008;Wu et al 2011) illustrated the instrumental effect of PEOU on attitude and PU. The findings of the current study are supported by the results of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Prior studies confirmed (Davis Jr 1986) Willingness of members to participate in professional… that if people perceive that a technology is easy to use, they are more likely to be a user of that technology. Wu et al (2011) found that the PEOU of a wireless technology has an impact on determining the intention and perceived usefulness of wireless technology usage. Joo and Sang (2013) demonstrated that the PEOU has a positive effect on both the attitude and PU of smartphone usage among Koreans.…”
Section: Perceived Ease Of Usementioning
confidence: 98%