2019
DOI: 10.17743/jaes.2019.0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-guided Rendering of Audio Objects Using an Interactive Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: Object-based audio allows for personalization of content, perhaps to improve accessibility or to increase quality of experience more generally. This paper describes the design and evaluation of an interactive audio renderer, which is used to optimize an audio mix based on the feedback of the listener. A panel of 14 trained participants were recruited to trial the system. The range of audio mixes produced using the proposed system was comparable to the range of mixes achieved using a traditional fader-based mix… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison purposes, SUS will be used in subsequent interpolator testing, but to probe this area further, the standard SUS questions will be augmented with additional items, more specific to the interface. This strategy has been shown to work successfully in other evaluations of audio technology interfaces [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For comparison purposes, SUS will be used in subsequent interpolator testing, but to probe this area further, the standard SUS questions will be augmented with additional items, more specific to the interface. This strategy has been shown to work successfully in other evaluations of audio technology interfaces [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In order to verify the effectiveness of the method in this paper, our method is compared with three state-of-the-art methods [11], [14], [20]. In our method and other three comparison methods, the population size N is 150, the maximum evolutionary number T 20.…”
Section: Experimental Comparison and Analysis A Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is further completed the fitness comparison of methods [11], [14], [20] and our method, and the experimental results are shown in Fig.9-10 and Tab.1-2. The following conclusions can be drawn from the figures and tables.…”
Section: Adaptive Fitness Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations