2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User perception of adapting video quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As standardized method, only the Single Stimulus Continuous Quality Evaluation (SSCQE) method, specified in [1] and for instance used in [8,27], is addressing long test sequences by enabling instantaneous evaluation of quality for the whole sequence. Recency and hysteresis effects of the human behavioral responses while continuously evaluating the time-varying video quality were observed [28].…”
Section: New Problems: Open Questions and Lack Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As standardized method, only the Single Stimulus Continuous Quality Evaluation (SSCQE) method, specified in [1] and for instance used in [8,27], is addressing long test sequences by enabling instantaneous evaluation of quality for the whole sequence. Recency and hysteresis effects of the human behavioral responses while continuously evaluating the time-varying video quality were observed [28].…”
Section: New Problems: Open Questions and Lack Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By observing how much time the Markov process spends in each state, and how often the process transitions between states, the mean video bitrate and the number of quality switches are obtained. These two factors play a major role in the viewers' QoE [3,5,15].…”
Section: Evaluating Bandwidth Sharing Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is also worth noting that a constant and continuous increment of the video rate may not always enhance QoE. In [3] it was demonstrated that when the video quality is high an increase in the current rate does not necessarily translate into an improvement in the user-perceived quality. Nevertheless, the paper made an important observation: when the buffer is used as the main factor of an ABR the trade-off between video quality and the amount of rebuffering is unnecessary.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an abrupt drop of the video quality), which is known to be detrimental to QoE [17,25] and to minimise the negative impact of recency effect [5,9], transition decision to q k+1 should depend on q k . Furthermore, since users are not known to be appreciative of an increase in the video quality when the video rate is relatively high [3] we recommend a nonlinear g ′ (R). In fact, Yamagishi and Hayashi [24] have shown that, given a set of linearly incremented video rates, the saturation begins to take effect at about halfway through the available video rates, when they studied the relationship between video rate and the subjective video quality.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation