2006
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20061093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Users' manual for the Hydroecological Integrity Assessment Process software (including the New Jersey Assessment Tools)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
127
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
127
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the regression relation indicate that the observed and calculated mean annual daily flow values are near unity (n = 43, R 2 = 0.9385, p < 0.0001; Kennen and Riskin 2010). This result is consistent with metric-validation results previously published for all NJHAT metrics (see Henriksen et al 2006, Kennen et al 2007). …”
Section: Hydrologic Variablessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results of the regression relation indicate that the observed and calculated mean annual daily flow values are near unity (n = 43, R 2 = 0.9385, p < 0.0001; Kennen and Riskin 2010). This result is consistent with metric-validation results previously published for all NJHAT metrics (see Henriksen et al 2006, Kennen et al 2007). …”
Section: Hydrologic Variablessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A total of 163 hydrologic variables derived using NJHAT (Henriksen et al 2006) were evaluated for this study. Scatterplots were used to examine data distributions and to detect potential outliers in the hydrologic variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flow regime classification is achieved commonly on the basis of stream flow characteristics using hydrologic indices with five stream flow components; magnitude, frequency, duration, timing, and rate of changes of flows [25,26]. In most of the studies, the hydrological indices of the rivers are calculated from a time series data recorded at gauging stations [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general approach for hydrological alteration assessment is based on the analysis of these metrics, which are compared before and after a river has been altered by human activities (Richter et al, 1996). This methodology, as well as other methods (Fernández Yuste et al, 2012;Henriksen et al, 2006;Martínez Santa-María and Fernández Yuste, 2008) generally used to analyse the status variations within a system over time, or to compare an altered system to a reference system, are based on streamflow data, which are referred to as un-impacted and impacted conditions. The method is simple to implement when streamflow data have been measured at the same river section before and after the change in the hydrological regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%