2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Users-orientated evaluation of building information model in the Chinese construction industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
114
6
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
12
114
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…At the organizational level, it is crucial to ensure support from the top management for adoption of a new innovation (Arayici et al, 2011b;Linderoth, 2010;Xu et al, 2014). Greater encouragement from the top management leads to increased BIM adoption benefits (Cao et al, 2015;Gu & London, 2010;Xu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Top Management Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the organizational level, it is crucial to ensure support from the top management for adoption of a new innovation (Arayici et al, 2011b;Linderoth, 2010;Xu et al, 2014). Greater encouragement from the top management leads to increased BIM adoption benefits (Cao et al, 2015;Gu & London, 2010;Xu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Top Management Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Xu et al (2014) have documented a summary of studies focused upon identification of factors influencing BIM adoption in various parts of the world. These studies provide a broad context of BIM adoption with limited or no focus on architectural firms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are academic studies in a considerable amount of countries: China (Xu, Feng & Li, 2014;Cao et al, 2015;Zhang, Wang, Chen & He, 2014;Ding, Zuo, Wu & Wang, 2015); Denmark (Anker Jensen & Jóhannesson, 2013;Movsisyan, 2016), Iceland (Kjartansdóttir, 2012), India (Luthra, 2010;Kumar & Mukherjee, 2009), Malaysia (Enegbuma & Ali, 2011;Teo, 2012;Latiffi, Mohd, Kasim & Fathi, 2013;Mohd-Nor & Grant, 2014), Portugal (Carvalho, 2016;Silva, Salvado, Couto & Azevedo, 2016), South Africa (Kekana, Aigbavboa & Thwala, 2014;Froise & Shakantu, 2014), Spain (Silvia, del Solar, de la Peña & Vivas 2017), Sweden (Hooper, 2015), United Kingdom (Eadie, Browne, Odeyinka, McKeown & McNiff, 2015;Khosrowshahi & Arayici, 2012), United States (Sattineni & Bradford, 2011), and various cross-country comparisons (Bui, Merschbrock & Munkvold, 2016;Gu, Singh, Tylor, London & Brankovic, 2010;Jung & Lee, 2015;Kassem, Succar & Dawood, 2013;Smith, 2014;Wong et al, 2009;Wong, Wong & Nadeem, 2010).…”
Section: Background State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para Singh, Gu e Wang (2011) Consoante pesquisa bibliográfica realizada por Xu et al (2014), os principais obstáculos para a difusão do Conceito de Modelagem da Informação são identificados principalmente no 78 contexto setorial. Os seguintes fatores são elencados como suporte para a implementação do conceito:…”
Section: A Implementação Do Conceito De Modelagem Da Informaçãounclassified