2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using HCA and TOPSIS approaches in personal digital assistant menu–icon interface design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study can be utilized as the basis for redesigning icons, particularly for icons related to COVID-19 prevention measures [ 48 ]. Furthermore, the approach can also be applied and extended for evaluating other medical icons [ 49 , 50 ], safety icons, disaster-related prevention icons [ 51 ], transportation-related icons [ 52 , 53 ], and even entertainment-related icons [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of this study can be utilized as the basis for redesigning icons, particularly for icons related to COVID-19 prevention measures [ 48 ]. Furthermore, the approach can also be applied and extended for evaluating other medical icons [ 49 , 50 ], safety icons, disaster-related prevention icons [ 51 ], transportation-related icons [ 52 , 53 ], and even entertainment-related icons [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shidpour et al (2016), Ayag˘and Ö zdemir (2009) and Geng et al (2010) use 1;9 to assign values to the judgement matrix. Zhang et al (2017) and Chen (2009) use 1;5 to assign values to the judgement matrix. This article uses the covariance formula to calculate the correlation, so the two methods of assignment do not change the relative value.…”
Section: Scheme Design and Scheme Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of functional requirement implementation, the aforementioned studies considered the relationship between quantitative requirements, resulting in not fully considering the conflict of requirements between qualitative objectives. Currently, quality function deployment (QFD; Takai and Kalapurackal, 2012), analytic hierarchy process (AHP; Saaty, 1994), grey relational analysis (GRA; Kuo et al, 2008), technique for order preference based on similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS; Hwang and Yoon, 1981) and Višekriterijumska Optimizacija i kompromisno Rešenje (VIKOR) (Chen et al, 2009) are the primary methods for analysis and optimization. The above methods are mainly used to deal with two problems: one is the weight value of the evaluation objectives and the other is the fuzzy and inaccurate problem of scheme evaluation data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HCT in this research used the furthest neighbor method, incorporating the Euclidean distance method in the Minkowski Metric approach to categorize the identified customer requirements. The furthest neighbor method (FNM) is expressed as [37][38][39]:…”
Section: Hct In Cr Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%