Using informatics to advance translational science: Environmental scan of adaptive capacity and preparedness of Clinical and Translational Science Award Program hubs

This article presents a landscape assessment of the findings from the 2021 Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Evaluators Survey. This survey was the most recent iteration of a well established, national, peer-led systematic snapshot of the CTSA evaluators, their skillsets, listed evaluation resources, preferred methods, and identified best practices. Three questions guided our study: who are the CTSA evaluators, what competencies do they share and how is their work used within hubs. We describe our survey process (logistics of development, deployment, and differences in historical context with prior instruments); and present its main findings. We provide specific recommendations for evaluation practice in two main categories (National vs Group-level) including, among others, the need for a national, strategic plan for evaluation as well as enhanced mentoring and training of the next generation of evaluators. Although based on the challenges and opportunities currently within the CTSA Consortium, takeaways from this study constitute important lessons with potential for application in other large evaluation consortia. To our knowledge, this is the first time 2021 survey findings are disseminated widely, to increase transparency of the CTSA evaluators' work and to motivate conversations within hub and beyond, as to how best to leverage existent evaluative capacity.

Section: Evaluation Team Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A landscape assessment of CTSA evaluators and their work in the CTSA consortium, 2021 survey findings

Hoyo,

Nehl,

Dozier

et al. 2024

“…During the COVID-19 pandemic, the adaptive capacity process has been employed to understand and modify translational research infrastructures [ 10 , 11 ]. While academicians engaged in these efforts recognize the importance of strengthening [ 12 ] and enhancing communication methods [ 13 ] to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, strategies are still needed to engage communities in sharing and disseminating information.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adapting the Evidence Academy model for virtual stakeholder engagement in a national setting during the COVID-19 pandemic

Carter-Edwards¹,

R.²,

Bilheimer³

et al. 2023

Adaptive capacity and preparedness of Clinical and Translational Science Award Program hubs: Overview of an environmental scan

Volkov¹,

Ragon²,

Doyle³

et al. 2022

The ability of research networks and individual institutions to effectively and efficiently prepare, respond, and adapt to emergent challenges is essential for the biomedical research enterprise. At the beginning of 2021, a special Working Group was formed by individuals in the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium and approved by the CTSA Steering Committee to explore "Adaptive Capacity and Preparedness (AC&P) of CTSA Hubs." The AC&P Working Group took a pragmatic Environmental Scan (E-Scan) approach of utilizing the diverse data that had been collected through existing mechanisms. The Local Adaptive Capacity framework was adapted to illustrate the interconnectedness of CTSA programs and services, while exposing how the demands of the pandemic forced them to quickly pivot and adapt. This paper presents a synopsis of the themes and lessons learned that emerged from individual sections of the E-Scan. Lessons learned from this study may improve our understanding of adaptive capacity and preparedness at different levels, as well as help strengthen the core service models, strategies, and foster innovation in clinical and translational science research.