2005
DOI: 10.1080/13803610500110687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Mixed-Methods to Examine Teachers' Attitudes to Educational Change: The case of theSkills for Lifestrategy for improving adult literacy and numeracy skills in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Giannakaki (2005) argued that "combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single study can help elucidate various aspects of the phenomenon under investigation, providing more holistic understanding" (p. 323). Sale, Lohfeld, and Brazil (2002) maintained that the two approaches could be combined because they share a unified logic of the common goal to understand the world around us.…”
Section: Mixed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giannakaki (2005) argued that "combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single study can help elucidate various aspects of the phenomenon under investigation, providing more holistic understanding" (p. 323). Sale, Lohfeld, and Brazil (2002) maintained that the two approaches could be combined because they share a unified logic of the common goal to understand the world around us.…”
Section: Mixed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the explanatory research design, quantitative data was collected first and then the qualitative data (quantitative +qualitative). The complementarity feature of the mixed method stands out in the research (Greene et al, 1989 andGiannakaki, 2005). In the qualitative research, from the probability sampling methods, stratified sampling method was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu yönüyle araştırmada karma yöntemin tamamlayıcılık (Complementarity) özelliği ön plana çıkmaktadır. Tamamlayıcılık bir yöntemden elde edilen bulguların detaylandırılması, sunulması, artırılması ve açıklığa kavuşturulmasında diğer yöntemin sonuçlarının kullanılmasıdır (Greene vd., 1989;Giannakaki, 2005 (Greene vd., 1989;Giannakaki, 2005). Araştırmada tamamlayıcılığı sağlamak için nitel veriler ilişkili oldukları nicel bulgularla birlikte verilmiştir.…”
Section: şEkil 1 Açıklayıcı Karma Yöntemunclassified
“…By using a mixed type method in this study, it was aimed to provide the data triangulation, which is the whole body of efforts made to increase cogency (Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2008). Along with that by detailing the collected data, it was aimed to reach the complementary principle purposed by Giannakaki (2005). Acording to Giannakaki the complementary principle is to have rich and detailed data by measuring the problem from different perspectives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%