2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using repair priorities to reduce stock investment in spare part networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also Guide Jr. and Srivastava (1997) and Kennedy et al (2002) provide a literature overview on spare part inventories and issues surrounding them such as emergency procedures (Alfredsson and Verrijdt, 1999;Song and Zipkin, 2009), lateral transshipments (Paterson et al, 2010), interaction with finite repair capacity (Sleptchenko et al, 2005), interaction with maintenance policies and obsolescence.…”
Section: Inventory Control Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Guide Jr. and Srivastava (1997) and Kennedy et al (2002) provide a literature overview on spare part inventories and issues surrounding them such as emergency procedures (Alfredsson and Verrijdt, 1999;Song and Zipkin, 2009), lateral transshipments (Paterson et al, 2010), interaction with finite repair capacity (Sleptchenko et al, 2005), interaction with maintenance policies and obsolescence.…”
Section: Inventory Control Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Heijden et al [40] provide a method for the joint optimization of spare parts inventories and throughput times of repair and transportation for multi-echelon, multi-indenture spare part networks. Additional related papers with finite repair capacity considerations can be found in Sleptchenko et al [120], Zijm and Avşar [165] and Tiemessen and Van Houtum [166].…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sleptchenko et al [119] study the trade-off between inventory and repair capacity by presenting a simultaneous optimization for both decisions. Sleptchenko et al [120] show that assigning repair priorities to repairable parts can reduce stock investment. A complicating factor regarding repairable parts is the condemnation aspect which refers to the fact that not all failed repairable parts can be repaired; some may be condemned and have to be replaced by new procurements.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under static priority rules, the priority of a spare part depends on its type only. Under these relatively simple rules, Sleptchenko et al (2005) and Adan et al (2009) have shown numerically that significant reductions in inventory investment are possible compared to simple first come first serve scheduling of repair jobs. More sophisticated priority rules also consider the on-hand inventory and expected future demand in deciding the priority of a part.…”
Section: Expediting and Repair Scheduling Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important models in spare parts inventory control have been consolidated in the books by Sherbrooke (2004) and Muckstadt (2005). Guide Jr. and Srivastava (1997) and Kennedy et al (2002) provide literature overviews on spare part inventories and issues surrounding them such as emergency procedures (Alfredsson and Verrijdt, 1999;Song and Zipkin, 2009), lateral transshipments (Paterson et al, 2011), interaction with finite repair capacity (Sleptchenko et al, 2005), interaction with maintenance policies and obsolescence.…”
Section: Inventory Control Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%