Using SBIRT for substance use relapse

Walters, Meghan M.

doi:10.1097/01.nurse.0000724424.00301.19

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some barriers to screening for addictive disorder in primary care such as lack of time, feelings of ineffectiveness, and patient reluctance have been reported [ 12 – 17 ]. Furthermore, while some SBIRT stages have been widely evaluated [ 18 – 21 ], little is known about the screening stage. The SBIRT screening stage relies on specific validated questionnaires (AUDIT, DAST, CRAFFT 2.0) [ 22 ] which assesses the extent of an existing, known addictive behavior but do not identify people with early addictive behavior ranging from unhealthy use to addictive disorders.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-analyzing addiction specialist and patient opinions and experiences about addictive disorder screening in primary care to identify interaction-related obstacles: a qualitative study

Pautrat

Renard

Riffault

et al. 2023

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Promptly identifying individuals with addictive disorders reduces mortality and morbidity and improves quality of life. Although screening in primary care with the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral Treatment strategy has been recommended since 2008, it remains underutilized. This may be due to barriers including lack of time, patient reluctance or perhaps the timing and approach for discussing addiction with their patients. Objective This study aims to explore and cross-analyze patient and addiction specialist experiences and opinions about early addictive disorder screening in primary care to identify interaction-related screening obstacles. Design and participants Qualitative study with purposive maximum variation sampling among nine addiction specialists and eight individuals with addiction disorders conducted between April 2017 and November 2019 in Val-de-Loire, France. Main Measures Using a grounded theory approach, verbatim data was collected from face-to-face interviews with addiction specialists and individuals with addiction disorders. These interviews explored their opinions and experiences with addiction screening in primary care. Initially, two independent investigators analyzed the coded verbatim according to the data triangulation principle. Secondly, convergences and divergences between addiction specialist and addict verbatim categories were identified, analyzed, and conceptualized. Key Results Four main interaction-related obstacles to early addictive disorder screening in primary care were identified and conceptualized: the new concepts of shared self-censorship and the patient's personal red line, issues not addressed during consultations, and opposition between how physicians and patients would like to approach addictive disorder screening. Conclusions To continue analysis of addictive disorder screening dynamics, further studies to examine the perspectives of all those involved in primary care are required. The information revealed from these studies will provide ideas to help patients and caregivers start discussing addiction and to help implement a collaborative team-based care approach. Trial registration This study is registered with the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) under No. 2017–093.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%