Using short vignettes to disentangle perceived capability from motivation: a test using walking and resistance training behaviors

Abstract

Self-efficacy is arguably the strongest correlate of physical activity, yet some researchers suggest this is because the construct confounds ability with motivation. We examine a more circumscribed construct, called perceived capability (PC), meant to measure ability but not motivation and propose that the construct will not be related to unskilled physical activities but may be linked to skilled behaviors. The purpose of this paper was to examine whether a PC construct can be stripped of motivation using a vignette approach in both walking and resistance training behaviors. Participants were a random sample of 248 university students, who were then randomly assigned to either answer resistance training or walking behavior questions. Both groups completed a PC measure and reasons for their answer before and after reading a vignette that clarified the phrasing of capability to a literal use of the term. PC was significantly (p < .01) higher post- compared to pre-vignette and the differences were greater (p < .01) for walking than for resistance training. PC had significantly (p < .01) smaller correlations with intention and self-reported behavior post-disambiguation, which resulted in a null relationship with walking but a small correlation with resistance training behavior. When PC was combined with intention to predict behavior, however, there was no significant (p > .05) difference in the amount of variance explained pre- to post-vignette. Thought listing showed that participants did not report capability barriers to walking and over half of the sample construed capability as motivation/other priorities pre-vignette. The findings support use of a vignette approach for researchers who wish to disentangle the assessment of PC from motivation while creating no overall loss in explained variance of physical activity.

Effect of changes of outcome expectations on physical activity self-efficacy ratings: A test of hypothetical incentives among mothers of young children.

“…Consistent with our hypothesis, self-efficacy ratings with an incentive were higher (very large effect size). This effect replicated what was observed in Rhodes et al (2016); however, importantly the current study held motivation constant through the use of an incentive for the first time rather than a vignette. It was expected that this effect would not also occur for the two nonregulatory behaviors (i.e., a 2-m fence jump, bench pressing 200 pounds).…”

Factors associated with participation in resistance training: a systematic review

“…Task (ie, perceived capability to perform RT actions) and barrier (perceived capability to overcome barriers to adhering to RT) self-efficacy45 56 might be especially important considerations. People need to feel confident to do RT behaviours (task self-efficacy) 74. Therefore, to improve adherence to RT interventions it may be important to assess an individual’s skills and support him or her to learn appropriate skills if this is required 88 89.…”

What do self‐efficacy items measure? Examining the discriminant content validity of self‐efficacy items

“…Despite its unwavering popularity in health behaviour theories and interventions, questions have been raised about the measurement of Bandura's original concept and the potential confounding between self‐efficacy, motivation, and outcome expectancies (Corcoran, ; Kirsch, , ; Williams, ) with particular focus on the scales used to measure self‐efficacy (Rhodes & Blanchard, ; Rhodes, Williams, & Mistry, ; Williams & Rhodes, ).…”