Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
INTRODUCTION. Postmarketing surveillance is the main mechanism to monitor and evaluate the safety of drugs approved for widespread clinical use. This mechanism provides up-to-date information on adverse drug reactions and facilitates the implementation of necessary measures to prevent or minimize the risks associated with pharmacotherapy. Marketing authorization holders should regularly conduct searches for and analyses of drug safety data from all available sources. The lack of practical recommendations for selecting relevant information sources complicates the development of an optimal strategy for collecting drug safety data necessary for timely detection of changes in the safety profile of a drug that may affect the benefit–risk ratio.AIM. This study aimed to select the most appropriate methods for collecting drug safety information from the open sources used to monitor the safety profiles of approved drugs and assess their benefit–risk ratios.DISCUSSION. The main sources of new information on the safety of drugs include pharmacovigilance databases, websites of regulatory authorities, publications in medical scientific journals, and real-world clinical practice. According to the analysis results, the most widely used databases are the World Health Organization (WHO) VigiBase database, the European Union (EU) EudraVigilance database, and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). This article also discusses the capabilities and interfaces of various applications for working with safety data, as well as the conditions for accessing databases. Additionally, the article provides detailed instructions on how to search for safety information on the websites of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA, which are considered to be the most reliable sources of information. Further, the article provides an overview of reputable medical journals most likely to publish articles on adverse drug reactions. In addition, the article covers bibliographic databases and search engines, which can simplify the search for scientific publications. Systematic monitoring of these sources can help marketing authorization holders to effectively assess the safety profiles and benefit–risk ratios of approved drugs.CONCLUSIONS. The use of recommended data sources can optimize the process of safety monitoring, significantly increase the identification rate for potential risks of pharmacotherapy, and facilitate the timely development of measures to prevent these risks. This, in turn, can contribute to improving the safety of patients and the quality of medical care.
INTRODUCTION. Postmarketing surveillance is the main mechanism to monitor and evaluate the safety of drugs approved for widespread clinical use. This mechanism provides up-to-date information on adverse drug reactions and facilitates the implementation of necessary measures to prevent or minimize the risks associated with pharmacotherapy. Marketing authorization holders should regularly conduct searches for and analyses of drug safety data from all available sources. The lack of practical recommendations for selecting relevant information sources complicates the development of an optimal strategy for collecting drug safety data necessary for timely detection of changes in the safety profile of a drug that may affect the benefit–risk ratio.AIM. This study aimed to select the most appropriate methods for collecting drug safety information from the open sources used to monitor the safety profiles of approved drugs and assess their benefit–risk ratios.DISCUSSION. The main sources of new information on the safety of drugs include pharmacovigilance databases, websites of regulatory authorities, publications in medical scientific journals, and real-world clinical practice. According to the analysis results, the most widely used databases are the World Health Organization (WHO) VigiBase database, the European Union (EU) EudraVigilance database, and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). This article also discusses the capabilities and interfaces of various applications for working with safety data, as well as the conditions for accessing databases. Additionally, the article provides detailed instructions on how to search for safety information on the websites of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA, which are considered to be the most reliable sources of information. Further, the article provides an overview of reputable medical journals most likely to publish articles on adverse drug reactions. In addition, the article covers bibliographic databases and search engines, which can simplify the search for scientific publications. Systematic monitoring of these sources can help marketing authorization holders to effectively assess the safety profiles and benefit–risk ratios of approved drugs.CONCLUSIONS. The use of recommended data sources can optimize the process of safety monitoring, significantly increase the identification rate for potential risks of pharmacotherapy, and facilitate the timely development of measures to prevent these risks. This, in turn, can contribute to improving the safety of patients and the quality of medical care.
INTRODUCTION. With the development of the Internet and the increasing availability of social networks and fora, patients have received an opportunity to share their medication experiences online. According to the guidelines on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices, social media can be considered an important additional source of patient-derived information in post-marketing surveillance, but the effectiveness of their use in detecting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is still being investigated.AIM. This study aimed to analyse the results of relevant original studies and assess the potential of using social networks and online patient fora as a source of information on ADRs associated with the use of medicinal products.DISCUSSION. Published studies indicate that posts on social networks and patient fora describe both minor and serious ADRs, including new ADRs. The relevance of social media as a source of information about the safety of a medicinal product varies depending on several factors, including the medicinal product class and time on the market, as well as the platform demographics. Young users (18–44 years) are interested in online discussions about medicinal products for mental and reproductive system disorders. Users aged 45–64 years tend to discuss the use of medicinal products for chronic pain (including muscle pain), menopause, and gastritis. Discussions among users over 65 years old predominantly focus on medicinal products for diabetes, heart conditions, and muscle pain. People are much more likely to describe ADRs associated with the use of medicinal products for orphan diseases and cancer on fora for patients than on social networks in general, and vice versa for ADRs associated with the use of medicinal products for mental disorders. In addition, social media may be of interest as a source of information about cases of overdose, misuse and off-label use of medicinal products, and use of medicinal products during pregnancy and lactation.CONCLUSIONS. Social media can be a source of valuable information about the safety of medicinal products and the impact of ADRs on the quality of patients’ lives. Marketing authorisation holders can obtain new information about the safety of medicinal products by extending their safety monitoring strategies to include social media. Nevertheless, since the relevance of a particular social network or patient forum for the detection of ADR cases varies considerably, a preliminary assessment is necessary to ascertain the presence of information on the medicinal product of interest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.