2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/269480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity to Optimize Sampling of Soil Penetration Resistance and to Improve the Estimations of Spatial Patterns of Soil Compaction

Abstract: This study presents a combined application of an EM38DD for assessing soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) and a dual-sensor vertical penetrometer Veris-3000 for measuring soil electrical conductivity (ECveris) and soil resistance to penetration (PR). The measurements were made at a 6 ha field cropped with forage maize under no-tillage after sowing and located in Northwestern Spain. The objective was to use data from ECa for improving the estimation of soil PR. First, data of ECa were used to determine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
8
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement results were shown similarity with the abovementioned literatures for silty-clay soils [25,27,30]. In addition to our results, for the obtained apparent soil ER values to be more significant, soil penetration resistance should be simultaneously measured and correlated with soil moisture content and bulk density [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. No faults were detected in the electromechanical, data acquisition, and software parts of the system during field operation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The measurement results were shown similarity with the abovementioned literatures for silty-clay soils [25,27,30]. In addition to our results, for the obtained apparent soil ER values to be more significant, soil penetration resistance should be simultaneously measured and correlated with soil moisture content and bulk density [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. No faults were detected in the electromechanical, data acquisition, and software parts of the system during field operation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Sensing of a single parameter of any environmental feature is not sufficient for the modeling due to the complex spatial structure and interactions. For example, Siqueira et al (2014) used two different soil EM probes (Veris P3000, Veris Technologies, Salina, KS, USA and EMD38 Dual Dipole Version, Geonics, Ontario, Canada, 2005) to generate optimal soil sampling designs and improve the spatial estimation of soil resistance to penetration (PR) on the field studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil drainage and drainage classes (including hydraulic conductivity)Rhoades et al (1997),Kravchenko et al (2002),Triantafilis et al (2004),Vervoort and Annen (2006),Liu et al (2008), aWeaver et al (2013), andRezaei et al (2016) Soil resistance to penetrationSiqueira et al (2014) a Data fusion: use of EC a (either ER or EMI) and 1 or more other proximal or satellite sensors (e.g., gamma-ray spectrometry, hyperspectral reflectance, synthetic aperture radar, LiDAR) or aerial photos.Definitions: EC a ¼ apparent soil electrical conductivity; ER ¼ electrical resistivity; EMI ¼ electromagnetic induction. Modified from Corwin, D.L., Lesch, S.M., 2005a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%