Using Sports Data to Advance Management Research: A Review and a Guide for Future Studies

Abstract

Sports contexts are increasingly used in management research to test and develop theory and explore managerially relevant phenomena. This growth in publications is likely driven by a series of advantages that sports data offers to management researchers. However, such positive features are not a panacea, as several drawbacks are also associated with leveraging sports data, which can limit their usefulness for management scholars. In this paper, we aim to provide management researchers guidance to leverage the advantages and avoid the drawbacks of leveraging sports contexts. To do so, we identify and review 249 papers published over the last 50 years that used sports data to advance management theories and shed light on managerial phenomena. After outlining how these works contributed to the growth of several key conversations in management research, we discuss the advantages of using sports data by outlining how they can advance management research both conceptually (e.g., theory building and radical theorizing) and empirically (e.g., triangulation and replication). We then discuss the potential drawbacks of research using sports data and suggest ways to compensate for them. We close by outlining several new directions in which scholars can leverage sports data to further advance management research.

Experience shapes non-linearities between team behavioral interdependence, team collaboration, and performance in massively multiplayer online games

“…More specifically, replicating previous results is important because management research is under a “replication crisis” 1 , which means that our paper contributes to the recently growing efforts of replication of previous results 24 , 25 . Moreover, we do so through methodological triangulation 26 , which consists in proving evidence regarding the consistency of previous results through different methods and data 27 .…”

The Effect of the Initial Distribution of Labor-Related Property Rights on the Allocative Efficiency of Labor Markets

“…While individual worker productivity is not accessible in most industries, professional sports provide a rigorous laboratory setting for measuring and comparing personal productivity data (Fonti et al, 2022). Not only do professional athletes "work" under standardized conditions, but standardized rules for games also allow the objective comparison of individual productivity.…”

Competitive Familiarity: Learning to Coordinate by Competing

“…Samsung encourages zero-sum competition among teams at the early stages of new product development, before combining them for subsequent development (Siegel and Chang 2005), and information technology firms integrate engineers from competing internal technology teams to develop and improve customer solutions (Taylor 2010). Political organizations (Goodwin 2005) and professional sports teams (Fonti et al 2023) too often field teams of former rivals. Similarly, prize-based engineering tournaments typically involve temporary teams of professionals (i.e., coders, engineers, and developers) who compete to create technical solutions to specific problems while allowing them to become collaborators on future projects (Lakhani et al 2013, Paik et al 2020.…”