2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.104974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using systems thinking to diagnose science-based fisheries management in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Laimon et al (2022) adopted systems thinking to analyse current energy development policies in Australia with aims to improve and support sustainable energy development policy. Systems thinking is also used to evaluate China's marine fisheries management system and determine how interaction among stakeholders affects the convergence to sustainable fisheries management in the study by Su et al (2022). Sunitiyoso et al (2022) explored the interactions among stakeholders to understand maritime logistics systems in Indonesia for performance improvement and intervention, whilst Kim et al (2021) used systems thinking to explore potential strategies for South Korea's automotive retail industry in facing the impact of technological disruption.…”
Section: Pap 261mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Laimon et al (2022) adopted systems thinking to analyse current energy development policies in Australia with aims to improve and support sustainable energy development policy. Systems thinking is also used to evaluate China's marine fisheries management system and determine how interaction among stakeholders affects the convergence to sustainable fisheries management in the study by Su et al (2022). Sunitiyoso et al (2022) explored the interactions among stakeholders to understand maritime logistics systems in Indonesia for performance improvement and intervention, whilst Kim et al (2021) used systems thinking to explore potential strategies for South Korea's automotive retail industry in facing the impact of technological disruption.…”
Section: Pap 261mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tiller et al (2014) used systems thinking to assess stakeholder adaptive capacity to salmon aquaculture policies in Norway. Other studies have used systems thinking to examine marine fisheries management systems in China (Su et al, 2022), South Africa (Sowman, 2011), and the United States (McGuire and Harris, 2011); the impact of Europe's coastal fisheries policy (Symes et al, 2015); and social-ecological links that can inform a transition toward sustainability in small-scale fisheries (Kittinger et al, 2013).…”
Section: Systems Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contribution of aquaculture to antibiotic resistance in Vietnam (Brunton et al, 2019); feasibility of potential interventions to reduce antibiotic use in tilapia farming in Egypt (Desbois et al, 2021); stakeholder adaptive capacity to salmon aquaculture policies in Norway (Tiller et al, 2014); marine fisheries management systems in the US (McGuire and Harris, 2011), China (Su et al, 2022) and South Africa (Sowman, 2011); impact of Europe's coastal fisheries policy (Symes et al, 2015); social-ecological links that can inform a transition toward sustainability in small-scale fisheries (Kittinger et al, 2013) ANNEX 2. Tools or methods applied in policy analysis of AqFS (Schiffer and Waale, 2008).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%