The magmatic and tectonic processes of the pre-2.5 Ga hot, young Earth differed profoundly from those of the modern planet. The ancient rocks differ strikingly in individual and collective composition, occurrence, association, and structure from modern rocks. Widespread forcing of Archean geology into plate-tectonic frameworks refl ects unwarranted faith in uniformitarianism and in inappropriate chemical discriminants, and disregard for the lack of features that characterize plate interactions. Archean crust records extreme and prolonged internal mobility and was far too weak and mobile to behave as rigid plates, required, by defi nition, for plate tectonics. None of the geologic indicators of subduction, arc magmatism, and continental sundering, separation, and convergence have been documented. No Archean oceanic crust or mantle has been recognized, and the only known basement to supracrustal rocks, including the thick basalts, high-Mg basalts, and ultramafi c lavas that typify greenstone successions, consists of tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) migmatites and gneisses. A thick global melabasaltic protocrust likely formed by ca. 4.45 Ga, and from it TTG suites were extracted by partial melting over the next 2 b.y. Delamination of the increasingly dense restitic protocrust enabled rise of lighter and hotter depleted mantle and hence more melting. The oldest known crustal materials are zircons, which scatter in age back to 4.4 Ga and are recycled in migmatites whose fi nal crystallization was after 3.8 Ga, and in ancient sediments. Earth may have had a dense greenhouse atmosphere, not a hydrosphere, before 3.6 Ga, for the oldest proved supracrustal rocks are of that age, and older felsic crust may have been too hot to permit rise of dense melts. Rigid plates of lithosphere did not stabilize until a billion years after that and then were mostly small and local. Dense lavas erupted atop mobile felsic crust after 3.6 Ga produced a density inversion that was partly righted by sinking of the volcanic rocks and rising of the subjacent TTG. In some places, the early dense rocks retained cohesion and sank as synclinal keels between rising domiform diapiric batholiths. In others, the early dense rocks sank deep into mobile TTG crust, and only later in Archean time was the felsic substrate strong enough to enable dome-and-keel style. The TTG substrate rose slowly, with variable amounts of partial melting to generate more-fractionated melts