Uterine Leiomyosarcoma Masquerading as a Malignant Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor: A Diagnostic Challenge

Abstract

Uterine sarcomas with myomelanocytic differentiation have been reported to be diagnostically challenging. We report a case of uterine leiomyosarcoma with extensive perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa)-like areas and extrauterine metastases. The patient was a 49-year-old gravida 3 para 2 Japanese woman with no relevant medical history. She noticed a vaginal mass with bleeding. Imaging examination revealed a uterine tumor and multiple liver and lung metastases. The vaginal tumor (3.5 cm) was resected and diagnosed as a malignant PEComa based on morphology and myomelanocytic marker expression. Clinically used targeted sequencing (FoundationOneCDx™) revealed gene alterations in RB1, TP53, and ATRX but not TSC1/2. Despite administration of an mTOR inhibitor, the tumor size increased, and subsequently, hysterectomy was performed to relieve the symptoms. The uterine tumor was composed of conventional leiomyosarcoma showing RB1 loss, wild-type TP53 staining, and retained ATRX expression, as well as adjacent predominant PEComa-like components with RB1 loss, TP53 overexpression, and ATRX loss, identical to the characteristics of the vaginal tumor. In the uterine tumor, both HMB-45 and MITF were weak to moderately positive for approximately 40% of tumor cells while Melan-A was negative. The tumor was finally diagnosed as leiomyosarcoma with PEComa-like features. This case exemplifies the tumorigenesis of diagnostically challenging tumors with myomelanocytic differentiation and demonstrates the importance of integrating multiple types of information, including genomic profiling, in making a correct diagnosis leading to appropriate treatment.

Uterine Leiomyosarcoma Associated With Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor

“…In another case, the uterine tumor was composed of an intimately admixed epithelioid (>90%) and pleomorphic spindle cell components (<10%) 36 . The former was immunohistochemically consistent with a malignant PEComa, whereas the latter was consistent with an LMS.…”