Utilización de la investigación por gestores de salud: desarrollo y validación de una herramienta de autodiagnóstico

González-Block, Miguel Ángel; Mercado, Francisco J.; Ochoa, Héctor; Rivera, Héctor; Idrovo, Álvaro J.

doi:10.1590/s0036-36342008000600010

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, in this article, our focus is on organisational capacity rather than the competence of individuals. The Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF) has developed a self-assessment tool for healthcare organisations to assist in identifying ways in which research can be gathered and used, as well as potential ways in which this can be improved [ 23 , 24 , 32 , 33 ]. This tool includes four key areas for the assessment of research use: the acquisition, assessment, adaptation and application of evidence.…”

Section: Questions To Considermentioning

confidence: 99%

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking

Oxman

Vandvik

Lavis

et al. 2009

Health Res Policy Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers.In this article, we address ways of organising efforts to support evidence-informed health policymaking. Efforts to link research to action may include a range of activities related to the production of research that is both highly relevant to – and appropriately synthesised for – policymakers. Such activities may include a mix of efforts used to link research to action, as well as the evaluation of such efforts. Little is known about how best to organise the range of activity options available and, until recently, there have been relatively few organisations responsible for supporting the use of research evidence in developing health policy. We suggest five questions that can help guide considerations of how to improve organisational arrangements to support the use of research evidence to inform health policy decision making. These are: 1. What is the capacity of your organisation to use research evidence to inform decision making? 2. What strategies should be used to ensure collaboration between policymakers, researchers and stakeholders? 3. What strategies should be used to ensure independence as well as the effective management of conflicts of interest? 4. What strategies should be used to ensure the use of systematic and transparent methods for accessing, appraising and using research evidence? 5. What strategies should be used to ensure adequate capacity to employ these methods?

show abstract

Section: Questions To Considermentioning

confidence: 99%

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking

Oxman

Vandvik

Lavis

et al. 2009

Health Res Policy Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…El análisis de necesidades de capacitación se realizó en dos etapas: a) análisis de contenido de los cuatro programas de trabajo del SMSP, con identificación de las competencias en salud pública y administración de programas implicadas para el desempeño de cada uno de ellos; b) revisión documental de políticas, estrategias y programas regionales de la OMS/OPS relacionados con las intervenciones del SMSP, para identificar nece-sidades y/o recomendaciones para la capacitación del personal de salud en Mesoamérica. 12,13 Sobre estas bases se realizó un mapeo de competencias a desarrollar en el personal de salud de los niveles estratégico, táctico y operativo, relacionados con la implementación de las intervenciones del SMSP. Asimismo, se identificaron instituciones de carácter académico y científico, públicas, sociales y privadas a las que se puede recurrir para el diseño e implementación de actividades de capacitación, de acuerdo con la temática identificada y su experiencia y ubicación en los países de la región.…”

Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified

“…10,11 Diversas organizaciones internacionales han desarrollado herra-mientas destinadas a apoyar este proceso. [12][13][14] En México, existen experiencias de establecimiento de interfaces entre la oferta de los investigadores con la demanda de conocimiento pertinente originada entre los decisores. [15][16][17] Destaca la creación de comunidades de práctica, grupos de personas con intereses comunes que entran en relaciones formalizadas con base en las metodologías de transferencia y gestión del conocimiento para la realización de un proyecto conjunto compartiendo repertorios y recursos.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Instituto Mesoamericano de Salud Pública: órgano de apoyo técnico y fortalecimiento del Sistema Mesoamericano de Salud Pública

González-Block¹,

Molina-Rodríguez²,

Becerril³

et al. 2011

Salud pública Méx

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Es preciso, asimismo, ejercer una intensa interacción entre investigadores y tomadores de decisión para garantizar la oferta y demanda del conocimiento. 6,7 Durante el año 2006 se validó en México una herramienta de autodiagnóstico de la capacidad para utilizar resultados de investigación vinculada con una guía de discusión de medidas para el fortalecimiento. La herramienta se validó en los planos interno y externo.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Utilización de la investigación por gestores de salud en México: diagnóstico de la capacidad y propuestas de fortalecimiento

González-Block

Mercado²,

Ochoa³

et al. 2008

Salud pública Méx

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. The perceived capacity of health management teams to utilize research for decision making is assessed, as well as proposals for strengthening such capacity. Materials and Methods. A total of 103 management teams (84.4% response rate) from a wide range of institutions in six contrasting and representative states in Mexico were asked to assess their perceived capacity for utilizing research and to propose strategies to strengthen that capacity. Qualitative and statistical techniques were used from April to November 2007, after approval by the Mexico National Institute of Public Health (INSP) Ethics Commission. Results. Significant differences across states were found. Only the acquisition of knowledge is significantly correlated with the human development index. The acquisition of research is identified as the priority for strengthening capacity, through increasing the qualifications of personnel in public health research. States with a lower human development index have more immediate needs for strengthening capacity. Proposals for strengthening capacity also depend on whether decision makers are aware of the importance of research. Conclusions. The use of self-assessment should be encouraged at the state and institutional levels. Different strategies should be used to address differences among states.

show abstract

Utilización de la investigación por gestores de salud: desarrollo y validación de una herramienta de autodiagnóstico

Abstract: 490salud

Cited by 6 publications

References 9 publications

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 2: Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking

Instituto Mesoamericano de Salud Pública: órgano de apoyo técnico y fortalecimiento del Sistema Mesoamericano de Salud Pública

Utilización de la investigación por gestores de salud en México: diagnóstico de la capacidad y propuestas de fortalecimiento

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About