Utilization of advanced molecular analyses in lung cancer: A country perspective—Young Research Group.

Abstract

e18027 Background: Molecular and genetic analyses in cancer treatment are continuously evolving, and taking part in patient management. This study evaluated the clinical practices of medical oncologists in Turkey for utilization of these methods in lung cancer patients. Methods: All medical oncologists registered to Turkish M.Oncology Society were called to participate an online survey about their practice patterns of using molecular and genetic analyses for the management of lung cancer patients. Survey included 19 questions for demographic data, work environment, knowledge about the molecular and genetic analyses, and barriers to use these methods. Results: A total of 188 medical oncologists (M/F: 117/71; mean age 39.3±6.7) were participated. The key findings: Work environment: Academia 49%; others 51% Checking mutations in adenocancer: 88.4% Molecular analyses available at home institution: 61.4% Checking EGFR, EML-ALK, ROS-1 in NSCLC: 75.7% Non-specifically checking markers: 58.2% Checking markers only for locally advanced/metastatic disease at diagnose: 75.1% Obtaining analyze results in: 8-14 days 45%; 15-21 days 31.2% Obtaining a positive EGFR/ALK report after initiating chemo: re-evaluate patient after 2/3 cycles 68.3%; stop chemo and shift to targeted therapy 20.6%; continue full-regimen 12.2% Maintenance therapy after response regardless of mutation: 36% If targeted therapy initiated regardless of mutation, the preferred 1st step cytotoxic chemo regimen in metastatic adenocancer: cisplatin+pemetrexed 50.2% Analyzing mutation from primary lung biopsy: 95.8% Re-biopsy if sample was inadequate: 91.5% Secondary biopsy for: EGFR/ALK discordance 38.1%; progression under treatment 46%; young patient 22.2%; never-smoker 34.9%; test-negative but presumed to be clinically-positive patient 46.6% Conclusions: Majority of the medical oncologists in Turkey use molecular and genetic analyses in clinical practice. But, the limited availability and the lags in obtaining results lead oncologists to initiate treatment primarily based on clinical findings. Once these methods become more available, targeted therapies and consequent favorable outcomes will increase in oncology practice.