„V hlave tridsať, v krížoch sto."

Voľanská, Ľubica

doi:10.31577/2016.9788022415446

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Špecifickou témou, v ktorej od konca 90. rokov rod vystupoval ako teoretický pojem a v ktorej sa rodová problematika prelínala s koncepciami využívanými v medicínskej antropológii, je životný cyklus. Vznikli práce venované menštruácii a menopauze, medikalizácii pôrodu a starnutiu (Beňová, 2010;Botiková, 1997Botiková, , 2008Botiková, , 2014Botiková, , 2016Botiková, , 2018Botiková, , 2021Herzánová, 2005Herzánová, , 2007Sekulová, 2015;Voľanská, 2016Voľanská, , 2017Voľanská, , 2018. Viaceré z nich aplikujú na slovenský kontext teoretické pojmy medicínskej antropológie, najmä koncept medikalizácie ako procesu, ktorý má za dôsledok nielen kontrolu dôležitých životných udalostí zo strany štátnej moci, ale aj autoritatívny postoj zdravotníkov voči ne-biomedicínskym postupom (napr.…”

Section: Telo a Myseľ: Habitus A Stelesnenieunclassified

Telo ako priesečník prírody a kultúry

Bužeková¹

2022

EtnoRozpra

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Until certain time, in social sciences and humanities the human body has usually been conceptualized as a universal biological basis on which culture performs its infinite diversity. In recent decades, the perception of the body primarily as a biological organism has been replaced by a more complex view: the body as an object of research is seen as the result of the interaction of different discourses, institutions, practices, technologies and ideologies. A shift in this understanding can be observed from the late 1970s onwards; and in the mid-1980s, the study of the body grew into a separate branch of research -the anthropology of the body. This period also saw the development of medical anthropology, in which the body occupied a central position. At the same time, representations of the body became important in the anthropology of gender. Thus, in recent decades, social science research has witnessed a sudden "rise" of the body to the position of an important theoretical category. The aim of this paper is to look at this theoretical shift from the perspective of the perennial debate about the opposition of nature and culture. This dichotomy is directly related to other oppositions of Western academic discourse: individual-society, reason-emotion and body-mind. The article discusses theoretical considerations that most explicitly reflect their interplay and are ultimately aimed at overcoming the nature-culture dichotomy. The author also refers to relevant ethnographic studies in Slovakia. It is concluded that social science research has shown that the body is not only a biological object: it is part of social relations and an inherent part of culture.

show abstract

Section: Telo a Myseľ: Habitus A Stelesnenieunclassified

Telo ako priesečník prírody a kultúry

Bužeková¹

2022

EtnoRozpra

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Book Reviews

Koštialová¹,

Mesežnikov

Bumová

et al. 2019

Slovenský Národopis / Slovak Ethnology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People, Space and Culture – Dimensions of Intergenerational Relationships. Introduction

Voľanská

Káčerová

Majo

2019

Slovenský Národopis / Slovak Ethnology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In everyday language, the notion of generation is used to try to explain the differences between groups of people of similar age and to place individual selves on a historical timeline. However, the concepts of "generation" used by various disciplines are very varied. The most widespread is the concept inspired by demography describing the average period during which children are born, grow up, become adults, and begin to have children of their own, generally considered to be about twenty or thirty years. In the Mannheimian tradition (Mannheim, 1952) generations can be understood as large social groups that as subjects were formed both by a significant social event and by a combination of changed social conditions that create a specific generational social climate. Generations are structured by individual preconditions as well as social and family background intertwined with the realms of ethnicity, religion, education, profession and political attitudes. However, generational competence is just one of the foundations of one's life orientation. Although the same event is experienced by a particular generational group, it can be internalized differently and therefore creates the basis of intra-generational contradictions. In this manner, it constructs the source of generational and social development.

show abstract

„V hlave tridsať, v krížoch sto."

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Telo ako priesečník prírody a kultúry

Telo ako priesečník prírody a kultúry

Book Reviews

People, Space and Culture – Dimensions of Intergenerational Relationships. Introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

„V hlave tridsať, v krížoch sto."

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Telo ako priesečník prírody a kultúry

Telo ako priesečník prírody a kultúry

Book Reviews

People, Space and Culture – Dimensions of Intergenerational Relationships. Introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Telo ako priesečník prírody a kultúry

Telo ako priesečník prírody a kultúry