2008
DOI: 10.15388/informatica.2008.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vague Rough Set Techniques for Uncertainty Processing in Relational Database Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, hybrid approach which used in the INDBS can be suitable in making treatment decisions. Both of Vague rough set model [23] and intuitionistic fuzzy rough technique [24] can be utilized as alternative techniques for RST in the developed versions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, hybrid approach which used in the INDBS can be suitable in making treatment decisions. Both of Vague rough set model [23] and intuitionistic fuzzy rough technique [24] can be utilized as alternative techniques for RST in the developed versions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mine prediction rules from the diabetes data using techniques supported by RST. Our choice of RST is due to its powerful nature of analyzing and handling vague and uncertain information in classification problems [ 50 ]. RST uses a formalism that represents and analyses data in its specific format that is described in a structured form called information system, therefore we named our dataset DMIS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rough set theory, introduced by Pawlak [1], is a kind of important theory about uncertainty information processing. So far, it has been successfully applied in data analysis, pattern recognition, machine learning and knowledge discovery, artificial intelligence, and so on [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Using the tool of entropy to deal with the uncertainty problem in rough set theory has been already studied [8][9][10][11], and the combination entropy was proposed in the literature [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%