2021
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating muscle mass cutoffs of four international sarcopenia‐working groups in Japanese people using DXA and BIA

Abstract: Background The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 recommended the use of dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to assess appendicular lean mass (ALM). AWGS, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Sarcopenia Project (FNIH), and International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS) reported different cutoff values for sarcopenia. We aimed to validate these cutoff values in a Japanese popu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, our results support the cut‐off value stipulated by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. The ASM estimated using a segmental multi‐frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis device has been reported to correlate well with that measured using dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry, 12–14 although a fixed‐bias was observed in the ASM value measured using InBody, i.e., in young to middle‐aged adults, ASM measured with InBody was approximately 10% lower as compared with that measured with other bioelectrical impedance device or dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry 14 . Because it was uncertain whether ASM measured with InBody was underestimated in this study of older adults, further longitudinal studies using different devices are needed to determine the cut‐off value from a perspective of prognosis prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In other words, our results support the cut‐off value stipulated by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. The ASM estimated using a segmental multi‐frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis device has been reported to correlate well with that measured using dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry, 12–14 although a fixed‐bias was observed in the ASM value measured using InBody, i.e., in young to middle‐aged adults, ASM measured with InBody was approximately 10% lower as compared with that measured with other bioelectrical impedance device or dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry 14 . Because it was uncertain whether ASM measured with InBody was underestimated in this study of older adults, further longitudinal studies using different devices are needed to determine the cut‐off value from a perspective of prognosis prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Two studies had reported an average of 6.8 kg/m 2 , one was conducted for 881 Japanese females aged 18–39 years [ 22 ] and the other was conducted for 1368 Japanese females aged 18–40 years [ 23 ]. A more recent study reported an average of 6.9 kg/m 2 conducted for 154 Japanese females aged 18–40 years [ 24 ]. The higher SMI reported in the present study is thought to be due to the participants' past exercise habituation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle mass was calculated from the impedance measured using the bioimpedance analyzer (Inbody s10; InBody Japan, Tokyo, Japan). To minimize the influence of the measurement device, we used Yamada’s formula: [ 24 ]. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated as the ratio between the appendicular skeletal muscle mass and the height squared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%