2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating SMAP SSS with in situ measurements

Abstract: Highlights Sea surface salinity retrieved from SMAP radiometer is validated with in situ data  SMAP achieved 0.2 PSU accuracy on a monthly basis in tropics comparing with Argo OI  SMAP can track large salinity changes occurred within a month consistent with buoy  SMAP SSS retrieved in Mediterranean sea and BOB assessed with ship TSG and Argo STS Highlights (for review) Abstract 11 12 Sea surface salinity (SSS) retrieved from SMAP radiometer measurements is validated 13 with in situ salinity measurements co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global Tropical Moored Buoy Array (McPhaden et al ., ) SSS, includes SSS observations from Research Moored Array for African‐Asian‐Australian Monsoon Analysis and Prediction (RAMA) in the Indian Ocean (McPhaden et al ., ), Tropical Atmosphere Ocean (TAO)/TRITON array in the Pacific (McPhaden, ; McPhaden et al ., ) and the Pilot Research Moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA: Servain et al ., ; Bourlès et al ., ). SSS observations from buoys are available at ∼1 m from the surface (Tang et al ., ). Recently, Remote Sensing Systems announced the latest version 3.0 SMAP SSS products (both 8‐day running mean and monthly mean) at 40 km and 70 km spatial resolutions which are available at http://podaac-opendap.jpl.nasa.gov/opendap/allData/smap.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Global Tropical Moored Buoy Array (McPhaden et al ., ) SSS, includes SSS observations from Research Moored Array for African‐Asian‐Australian Monsoon Analysis and Prediction (RAMA) in the Indian Ocean (McPhaden et al ., ), Tropical Atmosphere Ocean (TAO)/TRITON array in the Pacific (McPhaden, ; McPhaden et al ., ) and the Pilot Research Moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA: Servain et al ., ; Bourlès et al ., ). SSS observations from buoys are available at ∼1 m from the surface (Tang et al ., ). Recently, Remote Sensing Systems announced the latest version 3.0 SMAP SSS products (both 8‐day running mean and monthly mean) at 40 km and 70 km spatial resolutions which are available at http://podaac-opendap.jpl.nasa.gov/opendap/allData/smap.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Similar to the results demonstrated by Tang et al . () and Meissner et al . (), the estimated SSS using the present retrieval technique demonstrates the potential in capturing daily SSS change in the global ocean.…”
Section: Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This time variability is indeed present, but mostly for the higher latitude fresh bias regions where the magnitude increases during cold seasons (Figure 2b). In contrast, the tropical positive bias has only minor seasonal changes, in turn suggesting it may not be related to SST (Tang et al [12]). Also, note these bias estimates implicitly include any haline stratification that is present between the surface and the shallowest ARGO measurement level ~5 m, which is a factor that at present is poorly characterized (Grodsky et al [21]; Liu et al [22]; Song et al [23]).…”
Section: Global Distribution Of Smap Bias From Comparisons With Argomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite SSS is subject to an SST-dependent bias that is, at present, negative and amplified in winter and early spring due to the SST-related drop in microwave sensor sensitivity (e.g., Köhler et al [10]; Meissner et al [11]). On top of that, satellite SSS is subject to a land contamination bias (e.g., Tang et al [12]). The two bias components have pronounced seasonal signatures due to seasonal changes in SSTrelated sensor sensitivity and land emissivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%