Validating the Enright Self-Forgiveness Inventory (ESFI)

Kim, Jichan J.; Volk, Fred; Enright, Robert

doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01248-4

Cited by 16 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is verified in most of the measurement instruments in the list of items. Articles that addressed specific moral virtues empirically observed one or two virtues: appreciation of virtues and their links with status (Bai, Ho, & Yan, 2020), self-consideration and consideration for others (Grappi, Romani, & Bagozzi, 2013), moral courage (Mansur, Sobral, & Islam, 2020), gratitude (Bernabe-Valero, Blasco-Magraner, & García-March, 2020;Gulliford, Morgan, Hemming, & Abbott, 2019;Hudecek, Blabst, Morgan, & Lermer, 2020;Morgan, Gulliford, & Kristjánsson, 2017), gratitude and love (Diessner, Iyer, Smith, & Haidt, 2013), humility (Colombo, Strangmann, Houkes, Kostadinova, & Brandt, 2021;Qin, Liu, Brown, Zheng, & Owens, 2019), integrity (Castro-González, Bande, Fernández-Ferrín, & Kimura, 2019), justice (Beekun, Westerman, & Barghouti, 2005;Beugré, 2012), self-forgiveness (Kim, Volk, & Enright, 2021), respect and responsibility (Manly, Leonard, & Riemenschneider, 2015), good and bad character traits (Jiao, Yang, Guo, Xu, Zhang, & Jiang, 2020), resilience (Lasota, Tomaszek, & Bosacki, 2020) and temperance (Shahab & Adil, 2020).…”

Section: Presentation and Discussion Of Presentation And Discussion O...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, the importance of context, of action within a broader perspective (in life's trajectory), is highlighted. After making a few or several mistakes, one learns the virtues, such as self-forgiveness (Kim et al, 2021). Thus, a comprehensive ethical framework is desirable, a framework capable of considering negative and positive aspects of character, mistakes and successes, vices and virtues, as seems to be the case with virtue ethics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some articles discussed research results referring to two countries (Bai et al, 2020;Beekun et al, 2005;Hudecek et al, 2020;Seijts et al, 2015). Some studies recruited respondents via platforms, such as remote workers on Amazon Mturk (Bernabe-Valero et al, 2020;Colombo et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Mansur et al, 2020). In the selected article by Mansur et al (2020), the authors did not specify the research context when describing the sample, even though the authors are affiliated with a Brazilian university.…”

Section: Development and Application Of Scales On Moral Virtuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Analysis of Scales and Measures of Moral Virtues: A Systematic Review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to investigate how scales for the concept of moral virtues are constructed and measured, in studies associated with business ethics and the tradition of virtue ethics. Methods: a systematic literature review was conducted to select empirical articles on moral virtues that design or apply scales. Based on search, selection, and analysis criteria, five databases were consulted, and 37 papers were selected, with subsequent analysis of the scales development and measurement procedure (items, sample, factor analysis) and emerging factors. Results: the study gathers scales of multiple moral virtues (19) and of specific virtues (18), showing limitations in the generation of items, and in the item-sample proportion in some scales, as well as theoretical contributions in leadership and relationship strengthening, making a theoretical and methodological discussion in the light of the assumptions of virtue ethics in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Conclusions: the article intends to contribute to a better understanding of moral virtues in management, by discussing the scales from the unity of virtues and the phronesis-moral virtues connection, with implications for human behavior and business ethics. Procedures are recommended for future qualitative and quantitative studies in new research contexts.

show abstract

Section: Presentation and Discussion Of Presentation And Discussion O...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Development and Application Of Scales On Moral Virtuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of Scales and Measures of Moral Virtues: A Systematic Review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Isso se verifica em boa parte dos instrumentos de medida no estilo de lista de itens. Os artigos que abordam virtudes morais específicas se dedicam a observar empiricamente uma ou duas virtudes: admiração às virtudes e sua relação com status (Bai, Ho, & Yan, 2020), autoconsideração e consideração pelos outros (Grappi, Romani, & Bagozzi, 2013), coragem moral (Mansur, Sobral, & Islam, 2020), gratidão (Bernabe-Valero, Blasco-Magraner, & García-March, 2020Gulliford, Morgan, Hemming, & Abbott, 2019;Hudecek, Blabst, Morgan, & Lermer, 2020;Morgan, Gulliford, & Kristjánsson, 2017), gratidão e amor (Diessner, Iyer, Smith, & Haidt, 2013), humildade (Colombo, Strangmann, Houkes, Kostadinova, & Brandt, 2021;Qin, Liu, Brown, Zheng, & Owens, 2019), integridade (Castro-González, Bande, Fernández-Ferrín, & Kimura, 2019), justiça (Beekun, Westerman, & Barghouti, 2005;Beugré, 2012), perdão de si mesmo (Kim, Volk, & Enright, 2021), respeito e responsabilidade (Manly, Leonard, & Riemenschneider, 2015), traços bons e maus do caráter (Jiao, Yang, Guo, Xu, Zhang, & Jiang, 2020), resiliência (Lasota, Tomaszek, & Bosacki, 2020) e temperança (Shahab & Adil, 2020). Além de virtudes específicas, virtudes associadas à liderança foram uma temática para a qual se desenvolveram várias escalas (Mansur et al, 2020;Qin et al, 2019;Riggio, Zhu, Reina, & Maroosis, 2010;Thun & Kelloway, 2011;Sarros, Cooper, & Hartican, 2006;Seijts, Gands, Crossan, & Reno, 2015;Wang & Hackett, 2016).…”

Section: Apresentação E Discussão Dos Apresentação E Discussão Dos Re...unclassified

Análise de Escalas e Medidas de Virtudes Morais: Uma Revisão Sistemática

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Objetivo: investigar como as escalas para o conceito de virtudes morais são construídas e mensuradas, em estudos associados à ética empresarial e à tradição da ética das virtudes. Métodos: realizou-se uma revisão sistemática da literatura para selecionar artigos empíricos sobre virtudes morais que elaboram ou aplicam escalas. Com base em critérios de busca, seleção e análise, foram consultadas cinco bases de dados e selecionados 37 trabalhos, analisando-se o procedimento de desenvolvimento e mensuração de escalas (itens, amostra, análise fatorial) e fatores emergentes. Resultados: o estudo reúne escalas de múltiplas virtudes morais (19) e de virtudes específicas (18), evidenciando limitações na geração de itens e na proporção item-amostra em algumas escalas, como também contribuições teóricas em liderança e fortalecimento de relações, fazendo uma discussão teórico-metodológica, à luz dos pressupostos da ética das virtudes na tradição aristotélico-tomista. Conclusões: o artigo intenciona contribuir para uma melhor compreensão sobre as virtudes morais em administração, ao discutir as escalas a partir da unidade das virtudes e da conexão phronesis-virtudes morais, com implicações no comportamento humano e na ética empresarial. Recomendam-se procedimentos para estudos futuros qualitativos e quantitativos em novos contextos de pesquisa.

show abstract

“…Another scale conceptualizing self-forgiveness as a moral virtue and measuring selfforgiveness of a specific transgression is the Enright Self-Forgiveness Inventory (Kim, Volk, Enright, 2021). ESFI includes six subscales measuring positive and negative affect toward the self, positive and negative thoughts toward the self, and positive and negative action toward the self.…”

Section: Measuring Self-forgivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Polish adaptation The State Self-Forgiveeness Scale

Mróz

Sornat

2021

FetR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the presented study was to Polish version of The State Self-Forgiveness Scale (Wohl i in., 2008) – Skala Epizodycznego Przebaczenia Sobie. The scale is used to assess self-forgiveness after wrongdoing towards self and other persons. The scale consists of 17 items and two subscales describing feelings and actions as well as beliefs towards oneself, which are to lead to self-forgiveness. Four hundred forty four (Mage =27.8, SD=9.9) participated in the study. Both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory analysis were performed to determine the psychometric properties (RMSEA 0,048, GFI 0,924, PCLOSE 0,556). In order to determine the internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach’s alpha (0,80-0,86). The internal validity was assessed by Heartland Forgiveness Scale. The obtained results showed that the Polish version of The State Self-forgiveness Scale as tool with good psychometric properties and to recommend it for the assessment of self-forgiveness both in research.

show abstract

Validating the Enright Self-Forgiveness Inventory (ESFI)

Cited by 16 publications

References 28 publications

Analysis of Scales and Measures of Moral Virtues: A Systematic Review

Analysis of Scales and Measures of Moral Virtues: A Systematic Review

Análise de Escalas e Medidas de Virtudes Morais: Uma Revisão Sistemática

Polish adaptation The State Self-Forgiveeness Scale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About