2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.10.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and uncertainty study of a comprehensive list of 160 pesticide residues in multi-class vegetables by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
163
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
163
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The original procedure consists of extracting the homogenized sample by hand-shake or Vortex with the same amount of acetonitrile in order to have a final extract concentrated enough without the need of a solvent evaporation step. The technique has attracted the attention of pesticide analysis studies worldwide, [15][16][17][18] and a review has been published recently. 19 In the other hand, the research about pesticides analysis in dry samples (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original procedure consists of extracting the homogenized sample by hand-shake or Vortex with the same amount of acetonitrile in order to have a final extract concentrated enough without the need of a solvent evaporation step. The technique has attracted the attention of pesticide analysis studies worldwide, [15][16][17][18] and a review has been published recently. 19 In the other hand, the research about pesticides analysis in dry samples (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was considered to be a mild signal suppression or enhancement effect of between -20 and +20%. The values of these 11 kinds of organophosphorus pesticides were between 92 and 96% for each target analyte, 28 and the clean-up procedure performed well.…”
Section: Matrix Effectsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…17 They usually include a liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), 18,28 solid-phase extraction (SPE), 19,22,[41][42][43] solid-phase microextraction (SPME), 44,45 matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), [46][47][48] liquid-liquid microextraction, 49 dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), 50,51 temperature controlled ionic liquid dispersive liquid phase microextraction, 52 carbon nanotube reinforced hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction 53 or supercritical fluid extraction 54 followed by gas 20,50,[55][56][57][58][59][60] or liquid chromatography. 1,19,48,49,52,53,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] The low volatility and the thermolability of these compounds and the high polarities of the transformation products obviously favor the use of column liquid chromatography (LC) as the separation technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,[30][31][32] The identification of these compounds in different matrices as well as their quantification are of interest in the criminal field since the number of human 3,17,[33][34][35][36] 53 or supercritical fluid extraction 54 followed by gas 20,50,[55][56][57][58][59][60] or liquid chromatography. 1,19,48,49,52,53,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] The low volatility and the thermolability of these compounds and the high polarities of the transformation products obviously favor the use of column liquid chromatography (LC) as the separation technique.Due to the low detection levels required by regulatory agencies, efficient sample preparation and trace-level detection are important aspects in an analytical method. The extraction and cleanup steps are sometimes carried out simultaneously using techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE) and solvent extraction with low temperature partitioning (SE-LTP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%