1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00872136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and verification of knowledge-based systems: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 1, many anomalies have been described, like redundancies, incoherencies, cycles, etc. Many tools have been developed to detect these anomalies in different kinds of KBS (Nguyen, Perkins, Laffrey & Pecora, 1985;Rousset, 1988;Ayel & Rousset, 1990;Loiseau, 1990;Gupta, 1991;Meseguer, 1991). …”
Section: Anomaly Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As shown in Figure 1, many anomalies have been described, like redundancies, incoherencies, cycles, etc. Many tools have been developed to detect these anomalies in different kinds of KBS (Nguyen, Perkins, Laffrey & Pecora, 1985;Rousset, 1988;Ayel & Rousset, 1990;Loiseau, 1990;Gupta, 1991;Meseguer, 1991). …”
Section: Anomaly Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is clear that in this sense these two processes correspond to a very early stage of the development of knowledge bases and they actually provide a means to measure the quality of knowledge in a knowledge base (Preece, 2001). Another description of verification is given by (Gupta, 1993). According to him knowledge verification involves 1-Checking the completeness, consistency and correctness of knowledge, 2-Determining the accuracy and consistency of the reasoning mechanism in interpreting and applying the knowledge in the knowledge base to solve problems and 3-Comparing the system with its human counterparts and grading it thereof.…”
Section: Cross-domain Knowledge Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our experience from the three projects described earlier and on best practices as described in literature (eg (Preece et al, 1997;Gupta, 1993;Tsai et al, 1999)) we have identified (and largely implemented) an architecture of tool support for the development of rule bases.…”
Section: Core Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%