2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation d’une version française du 16-items Prodromal Questionnaire (fPQ16) chez des adolescents et jeunes adultes consultant en psychiatrie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of these screening instruments were not tested. A recent French study showed good screening performances of the fPQ-16 in older help-seeking adolescents (predictive value of 76%) with a cut-off score of 4 positive items (Lejuste et al, 2021)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of these screening instruments were not tested. A recent French study showed good screening performances of the fPQ-16 in older help-seeking adolescents (predictive value of 76%) with a cut-off score of 4 positive items (Lejuste et al, 2021)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of these screening instruments were not tested. A recent French study showed good screening performances of the fPQ‐16 in older help‐seeking adolescents (predictive value of 76%) with a cut‐off score of 4 positive items (Lejuste et al, 2021), whilst the predictive value of the fPCA has not been tested. Future studies should entail both fPQ‐16/ fPCA and diagnosis instruments for CHR‐P that are validated in French in child and adolescent populations to better investigate the internal validity of these screening instruments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 describes the patient referral process between the referrers (usual care settings for adolescents and young adults) and the EIS. As a first step, all potential referrals are screened with a self-rating questionnaire (prodromal questionnaire, short version; PQ-16 [20,21]) by their therapist (referrers). Based on previous studies, a PQ-16 score of 6 has been defined as the cut-off for initiating specialized psychosis risk assessment, using the SIPS or CAARMS interview (depending on the service) [22].…”
Section: Intervention: Service Delivery Changes Standardized Stepped-...mentioning
confidence: 99%