1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4347(96)00520-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay method for pharmacokinetic evaluation of busulfan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity is 10 -25 times higher than those of the UV-HPLC methods. 15,16,19,25 Selectivity of the method Several drugs examined gave no fluorescent derivatives under the described conditions, even at a concentration of 5 µg ml -1 , i.e. heparin, diazepam, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, melphalan, cytarabine, prednisolone, granisetron and morphine which are frequently coadministered with busulfan.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Busulfan In Human Serummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sensitivity is 10 -25 times higher than those of the UV-HPLC methods. 15,16,19,25 Selectivity of the method Several drugs examined gave no fluorescent derivatives under the described conditions, even at a concentration of 5 µg ml -1 , i.e. heparin, diazepam, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, melphalan, cytarabine, prednisolone, granisetron and morphine which are frequently coadministered with busulfan.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Busulfan In Human Serummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Analogous compounds such as 1,6-bis-(methanesulfonyloxy)hexane [20,21 ] [27] suitable as an IS are not available as commercial products. Our choice was BAD, a monofunctional alkylating compound, available as a crystalline and stable material, which is, in similar circumstances, routinely used as an IS for the determination of a bifunctional anticancer alkylating agent, dibromomannitol (DBM, myelobromol) [26].…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different analytical methods have been developed for busulfan measurement in plasma and other biological fluids, including GC and GC-MS [4][5][6][7], HPLC with UV detection [8][9][10], and with fluorescence detection [11,12] and LC-MS [13,14]. In the present study, we compared two published methods: (1) a rapid and accurate LC-MS assay with SIM mode, (2) a sensitive HPLC-FL assay using 2-naphthalenethiol derivatization for the busulfan quantitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%