2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.11.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a multi-residue method and estimation of measurement uncertainty of pesticides in drinking water using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four different other methods were compared with the present methodregarding the standardization of GC-MS. The present method took 50 min run time in comparison to 70.33 min [16], 60.17 min [24], 60 min [25], 55 min [26]. The less run time ofthepresent method in comparison to others was established.…”
Section: Standardization Of Extractionand Cleaning Up Stepmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Four different other methods were compared with the present methodregarding the standardization of GC-MS. The present method took 50 min run time in comparison to 70.33 min [16], 60.17 min [24], 60 min [25], 55 min [26]. The less run time ofthepresent method in comparison to others was established.…”
Section: Standardization Of Extractionand Cleaning Up Stepmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…ME is acceptable when it is in range of 80% to 120%. Any value of ME that is outside that range denotes that the matrix effect occurs in the MS measurement [46]. Due to the fact that there is no vegetable-based matrix-certified reference materials for multiclass pesticides commercially available at the moment, the assessment of the matrix effect and recovery of the sample preparation were performed by spiking experiments in this study as the proposal from B.K.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also provides to help the analyst make acceptable decisions. [39][40][41] The uncertainty measurements of each compound in water were determined by using the proposed method. The uncertainty sources in the method were specified to calculate the combined standard uncertainty in compliance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 42 and EURACHEM/Citac 29 guidelines.…”
Section: Measurement Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%