2012
DOI: 10.1002/acr.21767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a novel multibiomarker test to assess rheumatoid arthritis disease activity

Abstract: Objective Quantitative assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is important for patient management, and additional objective information may aid rheumatologists in clinical decision-making. We validated a recently-developed multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test relative to clinical disease activity in diverse RA cohorts. Methods Serum samples were obtained from the InFoRM, BRASS, and Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic cohorts. Levels of 12 biomarkers were measured and combined according… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
190
4
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
190
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The MBDA algorithm (Vectra DA algorithm score) has been validated and described previously 4,9,10 . The MBDA score is calculated by an algorithm in which levels of 12 biomarkers, mentioned in the previous paragraph, are entered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBDA algorithm (Vectra DA algorithm score) has been validated and described previously 4,9,10 . The MBDA score is calculated by an algorithm in which levels of 12 biomarkers, mentioned in the previous paragraph, are entered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the MBDA score was initially developed to correlate with the DAS28-CRP, and its RA disease activity categories were established using cutoffs that are specific to the DAS28-CRP (14). Thresholds for DAS28-CRP RA disease activity categories are systematically lower than the corresponding cutoffs in the DAS28 using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (15,16), as noted in the editorial accompanying Fleischmann and colleagues' article (17).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both the DAS28-CRP and the other clinical measures examined (e.g., CDAI, SDAI), the claim of no clear association between MBDA scores and commonly used, validated clinical measures was not supported by a statistical test of no association that cross-classified the MBDA category of each patient with his or her clinically defined RA disease activity category. 863 Regardless, because the MBDA score was designed to complement, not supplant, clinical assessment, some discordance between clinical and laboratory-based assessments is not only expected (14,18,19), but desirable. Otherwise, the laboratory test would contain no incremental information beyond that offered by clinical evaluation.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple biomarkers of disease activity in RA have been evaluated in studies originating from both Africa [6][7][8][9][10][11] and elsewhere [12][13][14][15][16]. In addition, commercial ventures have also focused on developing multi-array test profiles that may improve cost-effective management of RA [15,17].…”
Section: Rheumatoid Arthritis Research In Africamentioning
confidence: 99%