2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of actigraphy with continuous video-electroencephalography in children with epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The digital accelerometer enables the differentiation of probable sleep and wake states for each 30 s period of recording using a sleep/wake algorithm. Actigraphy has been validated against PSG, where it has shown high levels of sensitivity for detecting sleep [65]. Participants were asked to press the event marker when they got into bed at night and again when they got out of bed the following morning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital accelerometer enables the differentiation of probable sleep and wake states for each 30 s period of recording using a sleep/wake algorithm. Actigraphy has been validated against PSG, where it has shown high levels of sensitivity for detecting sleep [65]. Participants were asked to press the event marker when they got into bed at night and again when they got out of bed the following morning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actigraphy has been established as a valid and reliable method for measuring toddlers’ sleep (Sadeh & Acebo, 2002; Sadaka, et al, 2014; Sadeh, Lavie, Scher, Tirosh, Epstein, 1991; Acebo, et al, 1999). The actigraph used was a MicroMini Motion Logger (Ambulatory Monitoring, Inc., Ardsley, New York), which is a small watch-like device that records motor activity via an accelerometer that monitors both speed and degree of motion in 1-minute epochs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also have no way of determining if participants were subjected to external sleep disruptors such as pets, which could have influenced the output. Finally, while we recognise that multiple types of wrist actigraphs have been validated against PSG for multiple sleep outcomes in many groups, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] not all sleep parameters included in our study have been validated. It remains a possibility that some differences may be present between the first night and subsequent nights according to the actigraph type/manufacture, given that multiple devices are now available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%