2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an electrospray ionisation LC–MS/MS method for quantitative analysis of telaprevir and its R-diastereomer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis that compared quantitation in acidified vs nonacidified plasma that was subjected to room temperature for up to 8 h demonstrated that quantitation of telaprevir does not require acidification, while telaprevir-R does require acidification. Our results for telaprevir stability in patient samples were similar to the previous study of Penchala et al (2013), however telaprevir-R showed a more substantial change of concentrations in our study, possibly owing to longer exposure to room temperature. Our study also assessed more patient samples for the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An analysis that compared quantitation in acidified vs nonacidified plasma that was subjected to room temperature for up to 8 h demonstrated that quantitation of telaprevir does not require acidification, while telaprevir-R does require acidification. Our results for telaprevir stability in patient samples were similar to the previous study of Penchala et al (2013), however telaprevir-R showed a more substantial change of concentrations in our study, possibly owing to longer exposure to room temperature. Our study also assessed more patient samples for the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The liquid-liquid extraction protocol yielded a recovery of 58.1-67.4% (mean 63.8%) for telaprevir and 51.4-60.9% (mean 57.1%) for telaprevir-R ( Table 2). The recoveries were below those reported in Penchala et al (2013) using a similar extraction technique, leading to recoveries of >90%. The reasons for this difference were not investigated further because the extraction produced accurate and precise results.…”
Section: Chromatographycontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations