2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of EncephalApp_Stroop as screening tool for the detection of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in German patients with liver cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since this cut-off value displayed limited sensitivity (64.4%), our results are only partially in concordance with the previously mentioned study, in which the authors suggested that a total time of >186.63 s was suggestive of MHE, with a sensitivity of 86% [24]. On the other hand, Kaps et al reported that a total time cut-off value of >224.7 s had the best discriminatory ability for MHE diagnosis in the German population; all of these results are similar to our proposed cut-off values [25]. However, in contrast to this cohort study of Serbian patients, studies in the US population have shown rather good sensitivity and high specificity of the test and effectiveness in assessing the risk of progression to overt hepatic encephalopathy [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, since this cut-off value displayed limited sensitivity (64.4%), our results are only partially in concordance with the previously mentioned study, in which the authors suggested that a total time of >186.63 s was suggestive of MHE, with a sensitivity of 86% [24]. On the other hand, Kaps et al reported that a total time cut-off value of >224.7 s had the best discriminatory ability for MHE diagnosis in the German population; all of these results are similar to our proposed cut-off values [25]. However, in contrast to this cohort study of Serbian patients, studies in the US population have shown rather good sensitivity and high specificity of the test and effectiveness in assessing the risk of progression to overt hepatic encephalopathy [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… 13 However, previous studies conducted in different populations have found different optimal diagnostic cutoff values of the Stroop test that range from 186.63 to 274.9 s; meanwhile, even though correlations of results with factors such as age were found, the direct modeling using healthy controls is rarely been established and used. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 27 Bajaj et al. established the Stroop diagnostic model based on the characteristics of the American population, but it cannot be directly applied to patients in other countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to the multiple mental function aspects of CHE which may or may not be impaired simultaneously at the same level, and to the greater or lesser suitability of each test for a particular abnormality of mental function. For example, the PHES is most reliable for measuring cognitive impairment, whereas the Stroop test is good at evaluating attention and concentration capacities, ICT focuses on assessing executive functions such as attention and response inhibition, the CFF test concentrates on visual discrimination, and RBANS is specialized in revealing deficits in verbal and visual anterograde memory, working memory, cognitive processing speed, language ability, and visuospatial ability 21,24–28 . Therefore, in 2022 the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines stated that there was no gold standard for the diagnosis of CHE and that each test or tool had its advantages and disadvantages 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%