2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of rebound tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement in the rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the “D” mode (12.10 ± 0.42 mmHg) tended to have a higher IOP than the “P” mode (8.55 ± 0.36 mmHg) ( P < 0.001, Figure ). This is consistent with previous reports on IOP measurements with rebound tonometry in rabbits . There was no significant correlation between IOP and ICA parameters, or between IOP and gonioscopy grade.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the “D” mode (12.10 ± 0.42 mmHg) tended to have a higher IOP than the “P” mode (8.55 ± 0.36 mmHg) ( P < 0.001, Figure ). This is consistent with previous reports on IOP measurements with rebound tonometry in rabbits . There was no significant correlation between IOP and ICA parameters, or between IOP and gonioscopy grade.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Individuals were randomly selected from a population of companion rabbits that were seeking adoption at the House Rabbit Society in Broomfield, Colorado. Inclusion criteria were as follows: normal neurophthalmic examination, normal anterior segment examination as determined with slit lamp biomicroscopy and fluorescein staining, normal appearance of the fundus as determined by fundoscopy, and a phenol red thread test of >15 mm/15 s and an IOP of <20 mmHg . Rabbits selected for the study had no known recent history of illness or other medical concerns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on various species have validated the use of the Tonovet through correlation with manometry, but no rebound tonometer has been validated in an anuran species. Cannizzo et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on various species have validated the use of the Tonovet through correlation with manometry, [18][19][20][21][22] but no rebound tonometer has been validated in an anuran species. Cannizzo et al 11 created calibration curves for both Tonovet and TonoLab in American Bullfrogs, but neither tonometer produced IOP readings that matched the manometer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The manufacturer-specified accuracy of the TonoVet utilized in our studies was ± 2 mm Hg.) Note that the TonoVet is not specifically calibrated by the manufacturer for rabbit corneal biomechanical properties, and its IOP readings from rabbits are known to be systematically lower than intraocularly determined manometric IOPs 86 . More precise and detailed characterization of our sensor's in vivo performance in subsequent work will require improved reference-IOP measurements in the eye.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%