2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.709686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of simulated point response of columnar phosphor screens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous validation work has shown that simplifying the x-ray source and pinhole structure combination to a perpendicular incoming beam produces results that are much sharper than those produced with the correct x-ray source and pinhole geometries. 23 For these simulations, the x-ray focal spot was modeled as a circle with 100 µm diameter and a parallel beam. The true focal spot has a similar shape, but with two bright lobes and does not emit parallel rays.…”
Section: Ivc Accurate X-ray Source and Pinhole Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous validation work has shown that simplifying the x-ray source and pinhole structure combination to a perpendicular incoming beam produces results that are much sharper than those produced with the correct x-ray source and pinhole geometries. 23 For these simulations, the x-ray focal spot was modeled as a circle with 100 µm diameter and a parallel beam. The true focal spot has a similar shape, but with two bright lobes and does not emit parallel rays.…”
Section: Ivc Accurate X-ray Source and Pinhole Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the possible validation approaches that can be used to understand the ability of MANTIS to predict spatial spread of the signal due to particle and optical transport in columnar scintillators, we have focused the validation of detector models on matching several parameters that represent a more complete description of the phosphor being modeled [7], [34]. The three performance parameters we have previously used are the information (Swank) factor , the light output (either in absolute or relative scales depending on the availability of data from the literature), and the spatial detector response.…”
Section: B Phosphor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Kandarakis et al 1997a [35] Valais et al 2009 [36] Panayiotakis et al 1996 [37] Stevels and Schrama-de Pauw 1976 [4] Ginzburg and Dick [5] Kandarakis et al 2006 [6] Nikl 2006 [7] Valais et al 2005 [8] Kandarakis et al 1997b [9] Cavouras et al 2001 [10] Swank 1973 [11] Cavouras et al 1998b [12] Kandarakis et al 1999a [13] Kalivas et al 1999b [14] Cavouras et al 1996 [15] Cavouras et al 2005 [16] Kalivas et al 1999a [17] Kandarakis et al 1998b [21] Rivetti et al 2010 [22] Rowlands 2002 [23] Kalivas et al 2002 [24] Kandarakis et al 2001 [25] Leblans et al 2000 [26] Vedantham and Karellas 2010 [27] Schaefer -Prokop et al 2008 [28] Valais et al 2007 [29] van Eijk 2002 [30] Kandarakis and Cavouras 2001 [31] David et al 2016 [32] Kandarakis et al 1996 [33] Sprawls 1995 [34] Giakoumakis et al 1993 [38] Annalakshmi et al 2012…”
Section: Digital Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%