Validation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) – Japanese Version

Sakurai, Hiromu; Miyashita, Mitsunori; Imai, Kyoichi; Miyamoto, Shingo; Otani, Hiroyuki; Oishi, Ai; Kizawa, Yoshiyuki; Matsushima, Eisuke

doi:10.1093/jjco/hyy203

Cited by 89 publications

(98 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…IPOS was completed twice by 14 patients and test-retest reliability was confirmed by a sufficient intraclass-correlation coefficient. Some items showed low temporal stability, mainly items called Family anxiety, Practical problems, Drowsiness or Anxiety (0.02-0.33) which is not consistent with Japanese validation where items with the lowest temporal stability (0.522-0.622) were Share Feelings, Information and Practical Problems, for others items ICC was higher than 0.7 (14).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

“…IPOS was found to have excellent reliability (12)(13)(14)(15)(16) and face and content validity was also confirmed in several studies using cognitive interviews (11,17,18) Convergent validity has been confirmed for the original and German IPOS (13), Japanese version of IPOS (14) and French IPOS (16). In many other countries the process of validation is ongoing and all language version which are currently available, such as Portuguese, Polish, Greek etc., can be found online (www.pos-pal.org).This study aims to provide a valid version of IPOS in Czech and to report the psychometric properties of IPOS from this first pilot Czech study.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…The low temporal stability of these items in Czech IPOS might be also explained by the fact that time between measurement was longer than in previous studies and varied (M = 15.6, SD = 9). In other studies retest was conducted the next day (14,30).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the patients (88.6 %) needed help in the completion of IPOS. (14,15). As a part of the item analysis, we evaluated each item's difficulty and correlation with the total IPOS score (item-total correlation).…”

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: Reliability and content validity analysis

Vlčková

Hoschlova

Chroustova

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Outcome measurement is an essential part of the evaluation of palliative care and the measurements need to be reliable, valid and adapted to the culture in which they are used. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a widely used tool for assessing personal-level outcomes in palliative care. The aim of this study was to provide Czech version of IPOS and asses its psychometric properties. Methods: Patients receiving palliative care in hospice or hospitals completed the IPOS. The reliability of Czech IPOS was tested with Cronbach alpha (for internal consistency), the intraclass correlation coefficient for total IPOS score and weighted Kappa (for test-retest reliability of individual items). Factor analysis was used for elucidating the construct (Exploratory Factor Analysis). Convergent validity was tested with correlation analysis (Spearman correlation) in a part of the sample, who completed also the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS). Results: The sample consisted of 140 patients (mean age 72; 90 women; 81 % oncological disease). The Cronbach alpha was 0.789; intraclass correlation was 0.88. The correlations of IPOS with ESAS was R= 0.4 and PPS R= -0.2. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 2-factor solution on our data. The first factor covers emotional and information needs and the second factor covers physical symptoms. Conclusion: Czech IPOS has very good reliability regarding both internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Together with an item analysis results, we can conclude that the Czech adaptation of the tool was successful. The convergent validity needs to be assessed on the larger sample and the proposed 2-factor internal structure of the questionnaire has to be confirmed by using CFA.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Samplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: Reliability and content validity analysis

Vlčková

Hoschlova

Chroustova

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The importance of patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) is increasing. Particularly, in palliative care settings, PROs pertaining to patients' symptoms and QOL are very important, and are used in various studies . However, in case of individuals with dementia, the dementia‐specific symptoms have some aspects that makes the self‐evaluation of symptoms and QOL difficult.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Letter in response to: “Determinants of self‐ and carer‐rated quality of life and caregiver burden in Alzheimer disease”

Kajiwara

Kako

Noto

2019

Int J Geriat Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of hyperactive delirium in advanced cancer patients between inpatient palliative care and palliative home care

Hamano

Mori

Ozawa³

et al. 2020

Cancer Medicine

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Validation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) – Japanese Version

Cited by 89 publications

References 26 publications

Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: Reliability and content validity analysis

Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: Reliability and content validity analysis

Letter in response to: “Determinants of self‐ and carer‐rated quality of life and caregiver burden in Alzheimer disease”

Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of hyperactive delirium in advanced cancer patients between inpatient palliative care and palliative home care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About