2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.833487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Portable Next-Generation VECTRA H2 3D Imaging System for Periocular Anthropometry

Abstract: PurposePortable three-dimensional imaging systems are becoming increasingly common for facial measurement analysis. However, the reliability of portable devices may be affected by the necessity to take three pictures at three time points. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of portable devices for assessing the periocular region.MethodsIn 60 Caucasian volunteers (120 eyes), four facial scans (twice for each instrument) using the portable VECTRA H2 and static VECTRA M3 devices were perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface-based approach may be of value in combination with 3D photographing, which does not produce ionizing radiation, and is already used in several contemporary studies [17][18][19] . The presented approach for selecting the auricle surface from a virtual head may be applicable to 3D photographing as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface-based approach may be of value in combination with 3D photographing, which does not produce ionizing radiation, and is already used in several contemporary studies [17][18][19] . The presented approach for selecting the auricle surface from a virtual head may be applicable to 3D photographing as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photographs were taken before the treatment, 8 weeks, and 24 weeks after the treatment using a portable VECTRA H2 system (Canfield Scientific, Inc.) that was proved reliable in assessing linear distances, curve distances, and angles 6 . Pain during the procedure was assessed using a 5‐point Likert scale, and any side effects related to the procedure were documented by dermatologists throughout the treatment and observation period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of high-resolution camera technology, 3D imaging systems have been widely used in craniofacial, maxillofacial, and facial esthetic procedures [5,6] and are being increasingly used for ophthalmic applications and studies. In recent studies, detailed protocols for periocular landmarks have been developed [7,8], and the accuracy and reliability of linear, angular, and area measurements in the periocular region have been verified [9][10][11][12]. However, the reproducibility of volumetric measurements in the periocular region has not been fully validated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%