2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Spanish version of the questionnaire Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
1
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
31
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of the three subscales was tested using an internal consistency test, Cronbach's α. All subscales had a Cronbach's α between 0.76 and 0.89, which is consistent with prior research 17 18 23…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The reliability of the three subscales was tested using an internal consistency test, Cronbach's α. All subscales had a Cronbach's α between 0.76 and 0.89, which is consistent with prior research 17 18 23…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…International studies use the Practice Environment Scale (PES) (24) more frequently, which was created from the NWI-R but has not yet been validated for the Brazilian context. Moreover, in countries such as Spain (25) and South Korea (26) , the factor analysis of the validated versions of the instrument identified different NWI-R and PES subscales, making the comparison of results even more complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to our study, studies by Chiang and Lin, Salgueiro et al ., and Fuentelsaz et al ., the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.89–0.93. [11162021]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%