2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1457-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D for cancer patients in Korea

Abstract: The Korean version of the EQ-5D may be a valid tool for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with cancer. However, further research is needed to determine the reliability of the Korean EQ-5D over different time intervals and disease conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher BI score indicates more independence in physical functioning. There was evidence on validity and reliability of EQ-5D, SF-36 and BI in Korean population [26-29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher BI score indicates more independence in physical functioning. There was evidence on validity and reliability of EQ-5D, SF-36 and BI in Korean population [26-29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the HRQOL instruments have been evaluated and rated on all the nine measurement properties recommended by [29], and mCOH-QOL-Ostomy [37e39] were the instruments scored limited to strong positive evidence on all their measured properties without any negative or uncertain rating. Seven evaluated instruments were found to have at least one negative rating in any one of their reviewed measurement properties (version 3 of QLQ-C30 [27,29,30,65,66], Coping with CRC [58], Quality-Quantity Questionnaire [43], Mini-MAC Scale [49], SF-12 (version 2) [60], EQ-5D [72], and SF-6D [73]). …”
Section: Methodological Quality Of Each Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-two instruments were rated on this property with 11 rated as strong positive (version 1 of QLQ-C30 [28,64], version 3 of QLQ-C30 [5,27,30,65,66], QLQ-CR38 [21e27], QLQ-LMC21 [46,50], version 4 of FACT-G [23,27,69], FACT-C [23,27,33,34,55,59e61], FCSI-9 [35], FACIT-F [68], QLICP-CR [62], MSKCC Bowel Function [40,41], and EQ-5D [72]). …”
Section: Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 We used a Korean version of the EQ-5D that has been validated in the Korean population. 19,20 The questionnaire scores referred to the South Korean population-based preference weights for EQ-5D, each answer ranging from 0 to 1. The higher the total score, the better the quality of life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%