2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01938-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the oropharyngeal Mucositis quality of life scale

Abstract: Background Oral mucositis is one of the serious complications of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy that significantly affects the quality of patients’ life. The Oropharyngeal Mucositis-Specific Quality-of-Life questionnaire (OMQoL) is an acceptable instrument for measuring the quality of life in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of OMQoL questionnaire. Methods This study was a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale divides oral mucosa into four grades (0 -4): No oral mucositis (grade 0), the presence of oral soreness and erythema (grade 1), the presence of oral erythema and ulcers with solid diet tolerated (grade 2), the presence of oral ulcers with liquid diet only (grade 3), and oral alimentation impossible (grade 4) (33). The scale has been validated for use in Iran (34), and its validity has been confirmed in many studies (35,36). The reliability of the instrument was confirmed in the present study using inter-rater or interobserver reliability with a Kappa coefficient of 0.8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale divides oral mucosa into four grades (0 -4): No oral mucositis (grade 0), the presence of oral soreness and erythema (grade 1), the presence of oral erythema and ulcers with solid diet tolerated (grade 2), the presence of oral ulcers with liquid diet only (grade 3), and oral alimentation impossible (grade 4) (33). The scale has been validated for use in Iran (34), and its validity has been confirmed in many studies (35,36). The reliability of the instrument was confirmed in the present study using inter-rater or interobserver reliability with a Kappa coefficient of 0.8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%