Validity and Reliability of the Kinovea Program in Obtaining Angular and Distance Dimensions

Puig-Diví, Albert; Riu, Josep M.; Busquets-Faciaben, Albert; Padullés-Chando, Xavier; Escalona-Marfil, Carles; Marcos-Ruiz, Daniel

doi:10.20944/preprints201710.0042.v1

Cited by 31 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To evaluate the survey in the Bench Press Paralympic (vertical, horizontal, and displacement of the bar in the sagittal plane; a total distance of the bar path in the sagittal plane), dynamic time and the mean velocities of the bar were determined using a digitization software program (Kinovea 0.8.15, , accessed on 4 March 2020). The semi-automatic function was used to calculate the kinematic parameters, which was validated in practice [ 13 , 14 ]. For the collection of visual data, a digital video camera (frequency of 60 Hz and quality of 1080 p ) was used.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Strength and Muscle Activation Indicators in Sticking Point Region of National-Level Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes

Aidar

Clemente

Matos

et al. 2021

JFMK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The sticking region is considered an intervening factor in the performance of the bench press with high loads. Objective: To evaluate the strength indicators in the sticking point region in Powerlifting Paralympic athletes. Methods: Twelve Brazilian Powerlifting Paralympic athletes performed maximum isometric force (MIF), rate of force development (RFD), time at MIF, velocity, dynamic time in sticking, and surface electromyography in several distances from the bar to the chest. Results: For velocity, there was a difference between the pre-sticking and sticking region (1.98 ± 0.32 and 1.30 ± 0.43, p = 0.039) and dynamic time between the pre-sticking and the sticking region (0.40 ± 0.16 and 0.97 ± 0.37, p = 00.021). In static test for the MIF, differences were found between 5.0 cm and 15.0 cm (CI 95% 784; 1088; p = 0.010) and between 10.0 cm and 5.0 cm (CI 95% 527; 768; p < 0.001). Regarding the RFD, differences were found (CI 95% 938; 1240; p = 0.004) between 5.0 cm and 25.0 cm and between 10.0 cm and 25.0 cm (CI 95% 513; 732; p < 0.001). In relation to time, there were differences between 5.0 cm and 15.0 cm (CI 95% 0.330; 0.515; p < 0.001), 5.0 cm, and 25.0 cm (CI 95% 0.928; 1.345; p = 0.001), 10.0 cm and 15.0 cm (p < 0.05) and 15.0 cm and 25.0 cm (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the muscles in electromyography, although the triceps showed the highest muscle activation values. Conclusions: The maximum isometric force, rate of force development, time, velocity, and dynamic time had lower values, especially in the initial and intermediate phases in the sticking region.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Strength and Muscle Activation Indicators in Sticking Point Region of National-Level Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes

Aidar

Clemente

Matos

et al. 2021

JFMK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The recorded videos were examined by the KINOVEA software, which has already been verifi ed and validated [25,26]. The operator showed the exact location of the markers to the software by following each marker in each frame of the image.…”

Section: Kinematic Data Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparison of Lower Extremity Malalignment during HPF and TRD Approach at Forward Diving Straight

Hoseini¹,

Barati²,

Araghi³

et al. 2020

Open J Orthop Rheumatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Kinematic parameters that were evaluated were joint movement and angular velocity at metacapophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of index finger. Both of it were two of upmost kinematic parameters being analyzed.The kinematic analysis were conducted by using software Kinovea that had a quality, validity and reliability for measuring motion analysis (Charmant 2017, Chen et al 2015, Cordella et al 2014, Grigg et al 2017, Puig-Divi et al 2017, Mohamed 2015.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

AMRTA-X: Grasp Kinematic Analysis during Myoelectric Prehension Orthosis and Body Powered Prehension Orthosis's Usage on Brachial Plexus Injury Patients

Fundhi

2021

FMI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brachial Plexus Injury (BPI) results in decreased motor function in upper extremity and leads to reduced hand grasping movement. Orthotic prehension is designed to create artificial grasp movements in paralyzed hand. This study was to compare grasp kinematic improvement between body powered and myoelectric prehension orthosis usage in patients with BPI. This study was a single group without control and post test with experimental study. The subjects of the study (n = 11) were brachial plexus injury patients with non-functional hand strength. Joint motion and angular velocity of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of index finger were evaluated. There was an improvement in joint motion and angular velocity after both orthosis usage. Joint motion in MCP and PIP, Angular velocity in MCP were not significantly different between myoelectric and body powered and myoelectric prehension orthosis usage. PIP angular velocity improvement were better after body powered prehension orthosis usage (p= 0.03).In conclusion, body powered and myolectric prehension orthosis usage improved kinematic parameter of index finger’s MCP and PIP joint. PIP angular velocity was better after body powered prehension orthosis usage.

show abstract

Validity and Reliability of the Kinovea Program in Obtaining Angular and Distance Dimensions

Abstract: Clinical rehabilitation and sports performance analysis both require the objectification of 12 movement. Kinovea © is a free 2D motion analysis software that enables the establishment of 13 kinematics parameters. This low-cost technology has been used in sports sciences, as well as

Cited by 31 publications

References 36 publications

Evaluation of Strength and Muscle Activation Indicators in Sticking Point Region of National-Level Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes

Evaluation of Strength and Muscle Activation Indicators in Sticking Point Region of National-Level Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes

The Comparison of Lower Extremity Malalignment during HPF and TRD Approach at Forward Diving Straight

AMRTA-X: Grasp Kinematic Analysis during Myoelectric Prehension Orthosis and Body Powered Prehension Orthosis's Usage on Brachial Plexus Injury Patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About