Validity Issues in Narrative Research

Abstract

Attention to the judgments about the validity of research-generated knowledge claims is integral to all social science research. During the past several decades, knowledge development has been split into two communities: conventional researchers and reformist researchers. Narrative research is positioned within the reformist community. The two communities use different kinds of data and employ different analytic processes. In both communities, researchers develop arguments to convince readers of the validity of their knowledge claims. Both need to respond to threats to validity inherent in their designs. The threats particular to narrative research relate to two areas: the differences in people's experienced meaning and the stories they tell about this meaning and the connections between storied texts and the interpretations of those texts.

Protective Factors in Families: Themes From a Socioecological Study of Australian Defence Force Families Experiencing Parental Deployment

“…In this study, a narrative methodology was employed that involves rebuilding individual experiences within personal and social contexts (Pinnegar & Daynes, 2007), solicited through research (Polkinghorne, 2007). While narrative research is considered a contemporary approach, Clandinin and Rosiek (2007) argued that we have discussed the stories we tell for about as long as we have been telling them.…”

Pregnancy, risk perception and use of complementary and alternative medicine

“…Knowledge claims made for narrative research need to be supported by strong and powerful arguments which allow for the presentation of meaning experienced by people (Polkinghorne 2007). Permission to undertake the study was granted by the University Ethics Committee 1 A mixed sampling approach was used incorporating both purposive and snowballing strategies to identify a sample of women who had used CAM during pregnancy and childbirth.…”

A Racionalidade Limitada e a Percepção Seletiva no Processo Decisório na Área de P&D

“…O discurso dos entrevistados é composto de elementos objetivos e subjetivos que são interpretados a partir de pressupostos que foram constituídos a partir sua trajetória pessoal e profissional. Estes pressupostos moldam as respostas das questões e são utilizados de parâmetro para classificar a natureza da ocorrência (Polkinghorne, 2007).…”