2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of self-reported weight and height for BMI classification: A cross-sectional study among young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
2
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
77
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have shown lower agreement between that reported and measured height than reported and measured weight, which leads to errors when classifying nutritional status (54)(55)(56) . Other studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between measured and self-reported weight (r = 0•99; P < 0•001) (57) , supporting the use of self-reported weight data in cross-sectional studies. Moreover, a study that also evaluated adolescents of both genders residing in the city of Sao Paulo (near the city of Campinas and with a similar population as that of the present study) demonstrated a high correlation between self-reported and measured weight (r > 0•94) (58) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Some studies have shown lower agreement between that reported and measured height than reported and measured weight, which leads to errors when classifying nutritional status (54)(55)(56) . Other studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between measured and self-reported weight (r = 0•99; P < 0•001) (57) , supporting the use of self-reported weight data in cross-sectional studies. Moreover, a study that also evaluated adolescents of both genders residing in the city of Sao Paulo (near the city of Campinas and with a similar population as that of the present study) demonstrated a high correlation between self-reported and measured weight (r > 0•94) (58) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Country of birth (born in Australia, other country or prefer not to say) and geographic location (Sydney, outer Sydney or regional) which was assessed by the Accessibility Remoteness Index of Australia [ 20 ]. At the conclusion of the three 24 h recalls the participants completed an online demographic questionnaire which included questions on self-reported height and weight to calculate Body Mass Index (BMI) and a sample were measured by research staff to validate this measure [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Height and weight were converted to kilograms and meters in order to calculate =BMI (kg/m 2 ). Although accuracy of self‐reported body weight remains debated, evidence suggests that this approach has reasonable validity 10 . Participants were also asked to indicate if at the time of the assessment they were currently trying to lose weight, gain weight, or if they were not currently trying to change their weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%