1997
DOI: 10.3109/11038129709035718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of the Swedish Version of the Worker Role Interview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In occupational therapy, for example, research instruments have been developed to measure function and work ability. However, these instruments have usually been developed for patient groups where the degree of impaired work ability is much more extensive than in an average sick-leave group (5,6). Development of methods with a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for improving the assessment of the ability to work.…”
Section: Content Of the Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In occupational therapy, for example, research instruments have been developed to measure function and work ability. However, these instruments have usually been developed for patient groups where the degree of impaired work ability is much more extensive than in an average sick-leave group (5,6). Development of methods with a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for improving the assessment of the ability to work.…”
Section: Content Of the Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, studies of the WRI and OPHI scales, which use a generic format to rate all items, have found that all the items share a common scale (20,21). However, raters using these two scales show greater differences in rater severity (20,21). Consequently, the property of the scale that appears to reduce rater differences also appears to result in items that are not scaled the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, the present study also found that each OCAIRS item has its own unique scale (an unexpected but understandable finding given the unique criteria for rating each item). In contrast, studies of the WRI and OPHI scales, which use a generic format to rate all items, have found that all the items share a common scale (20,21). However, raters using these two scales show greater differences in rater severity (20,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is an assessment conceptually based on the MOHO and designed to identify psychosocial and environmental factors that influence a client's ability to find a job, remain in work or return to work after injury or disease. Since the 1990s the psychometric properties of the WRI have been investigated and developed through research (Forsyth et al, 2006;Fenger & Kramer, 2007;Ekbladh et al 2010a;Haglund, Karlsson, Kielhofner & Lai 1997;Lohss, Forsyth & Kottorp, 2012;Yngve & Ekbladh, 2015).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%