Value-Based Payment for Cardiovascular Care: Getting to the Heart of the Matter

Wadhera, Rishi K.

doi:10.1161/circulationaha.123.065661

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…24,25 Clinicians, health system leaders, and policy experts have voiced concerns that current quality measures fail to adequately account for patient social risk factors. 14,23,[26][27][28][29] However, directly adjusting quality measures for social risk is controversial because it could be perceived as lowering the standard of care or obfuscating poorer outcomes among underserved patients. 30,31 c Positive values represent increased payment adjustments and negative values represent decreased payment adjustments.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These disproportionate penalties may exacerbate the financial instability of safety net and rural hospitals, which are already operating on thin margins and closing at alarming rates . Clinicians, health system leaders, and policy experts have voiced concerns that current quality measures fail to adequately account for patient social risk factors . However, directly adjusting quality measures for social risk is controversial because it could be perceived as lowering the standard of care or obfuscating poorer outcomes among underserved patients .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Health Equity Adjustment and Hospital Performance in the Medicare Value-Based Purchasing Program

Liu,

Sandhu,

Joynt Maddox

et al. 2024

JAMA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ImportanceMedicare’s Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program will provide a health equity adjustment (HEA) to hospitals that have greater proportions of patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and that offer high-quality care beginning in fiscal year 2026. However, which hospitals will benefit most from this policy change and to what extent are unknown.ObjectiveTo estimate potential changes in hospital performance after HEA and examine hospital patient mix, structural, and geographic characteristics associated with receipt of increased payments.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study analyzed all 2676 hospitals participating in the HVBP program in fiscal year 2021. Publicly available data on program performance and hospital characteristics were linked to Medicare claims data on all inpatient stays for dual-eligible beneficiaries at each hospital to calculate HEA points and HVBP payment adjustments.ExposuresHospital Value-Based Purchasing program HEA.Main Outcomes and MeasuresReclassification of HVBP bonus or penalty status and changes in payment adjustments across hospital characteristics.ResultsOf 2676 hospitals participating in the HVBP program in fiscal year 2021, 1470 (54.9%) received bonuses and 1206 (45.1%) received penalties. After HEA, 102 hospitals (6.9%) were reclassified from bonus to penalty status, whereas 119 (9.9%) were reclassified from penalty to bonus status. At the hospital level, mean (SD) HVBP payment adjustments decreased by $4534 ($90 033) after HEA, ranging from a maximum reduction of $1 014 276 to a maximum increase of $1 523 765. At the aggregate level, net-positive changes in payment adjustments were largest among safety net hospitals ($28 971 708) and those caring for a higher proportion of Black patients ($15 468 445). The likelihood of experiencing increases in payment adjustments was significantly higher among safety net compared with non–safety net hospitals (574 of 683 [84.0%] vs 709 of 1993 [35.6%]; adjusted rate ratio [ARR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.89-2.20]) and high-proportion Black hospitals compared with non–high-proportion Black hospitals (396 of 523 [75.7%] vs 887 of 2153 [41.2%]; ARR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.29-1.51]). Rural hospitals (374 of 612 [61.1%] vs 909 of 2064 [44.0%]; ARR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.30-1.58]), as well as those located in the South (598 of 1040 [57.5%] vs 192 of 439 [43.7%]; ARR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.10-1.42]) and in Medicaid expansion states (801 of 1651 [48.5%] vs 482 of 1025 [47.0%]; ARR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.06-1.28]), were also more likely to experience increased payment adjustments after HEA compared with their urban, Northeastern, and Medicaid nonexpansion state counterparts, respectively.Conclusions and RelevanceMedicare’s implementation of HEA in the HVBP program will significantly reclassify hospital performance and redistribute program payments, with safety net and high-proportion Black hospitals benefiting most from this policy change. These findings suggest that HEA is an important strategy to ensure that value-based payment programs are more equitable.

show abstract