2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Liver Function Tests in Cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The severity of liver dysfunction is often estimated using the MELD score or CTP classification. MELD is a continuous score derived from the calculation of serum creatinine and bilirubin levels and the international normalized PT ratio ( 55 57 ). However, MELD has been widely adopted for end-stage cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation ( 2 ) and is specifically designed for patients with end-stage cirrhosis ( 58 60 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of liver dysfunction is often estimated using the MELD score or CTP classification. MELD is a continuous score derived from the calculation of serum creatinine and bilirubin levels and the international normalized PT ratio ( 55 57 ). However, MELD has been widely adopted for end-stage cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation ( 2 ) and is specifically designed for patients with end-stage cirrhosis ( 58 60 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Assessment of hepatic function in clinical routine is done by several ways but each of them bears their own limitations. They consist of measurements of single liver parameters including ALT or AST, markers of cholestasis, albumin, and prothrombin time or combinations of blood parameters in form of various indices such as the FIB-4 score 27 . Imaging-based assessment of the liver, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUCs of FLIS at 5, 10 and 15 min after enhancement for predicting ICG-R 15 of 10% or less were 0.838, 0.802 and 0.723, respectively ( p < 0.001); those for predicting ICG-R 15 of greater than 20% were 0.793, 0.824, and 0.756, respectively ( p < 0.001); those for predicting ICG-R 15 of greater than 40% were 0.728, 0.755 and 0.741, respectively ( p < 0.01); those for predicting ALBI grade were 0.734, 0.761, and 0.691, respectively ( p ≤ 0.001); those for predicting CP A cirrhosis were 0.806, 0.821, and 0.829, respectively ( p < 0.001); those for predicting MELD score of 10 or less were 0.837, 0.877, and 0.837, respectively ( p < 0.001). Previous studies have shown that patients have a good liver function and bisector ectomy can be done if ICG-R 15 is between 0 and 10%; it is a contraindication for major hepatectomy and right sided section ectomy or left sided hepatectomy can be done if ICG-R 15 is between 10 and 19%; it indicates the poor liver compensatory function, which is a contraindication for liver resection, and enucleation can be done if ICG-R 15 is greater than 40% ( Imamura et al, 2005 ; Sharma., 2022 ). FLIS provided acceptable diagnostic performance for detecting patients with ICG-R 15 of greater than 20% or 40%, which is crucial for treatment planning in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and prevention of post-hepatectomy hepatic insufficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%