2020
DOI: 10.1177/0300060519889432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of multi-detector computed tomography during intra-arterial infusion of contrast medium for locating insulinomas

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography (CT) during intra-arterial infusion of contrast medium (MDCT-IA) for locating insulinomas. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with insulinomas who underwent surgery at the Chinese PLA General Hospital in 2013 to 2014. The patients' case notes and investigation results were reviewed. Preoperative tumor localization was carried out by MDCT-IA and noninvasive methods including MDCT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kang et al (29) analyzed the factors associated with missed and misinterpreted cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, they found that a significant number of missed tumors were <2 cm (45/107, 42%), iso-attenuating on CT (32/72, 44%) or non-contour deforming (44/107, 41%), and most (29/49, 59%) misinterpreted examinations were reported as uncomplicated pancreatitis. Therefore, given that differentiation between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and focal chronic pancreatitis remains a challenge in CECT (30), the low specificity of CECT for depicting pancreatic carcinoma in this study seems reasonable; besides, the low amount of disease negative patients may also be a factor causing the low specificity. This also resulted in the low combined specificity in the total group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Kang et al (29) analyzed the factors associated with missed and misinterpreted cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, they found that a significant number of missed tumors were <2 cm (45/107, 42%), iso-attenuating on CT (32/72, 44%) or non-contour deforming (44/107, 41%), and most (29/49, 59%) misinterpreted examinations were reported as uncomplicated pancreatitis. Therefore, given that differentiation between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and focal chronic pancreatitis remains a challenge in CECT (30), the low specificity of CECT for depicting pancreatic carcinoma in this study seems reasonable; besides, the low amount of disease negative patients may also be a factor causing the low specificity. This also resulted in the low combined specificity in the total group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Tumor location was successfully determined in 12/12 patients by MDCT-IA (100%) compared to 9/11 by magnetic resonance imaging (81.8%), 4/7 by CT (57.1%) and 7/12 by ultrasound-enhanced contrast (CEUS) (58.3%). Overall, MDCT-IA correctly located 100% of the lesions [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Conventional computed tomography (CT) has sensitivity comparable to that of ultrasound, ranging from 22% to 43%. Multidetector computed tomography during intraarterial infusion of contrast medium (MDCT-IA) was evaluated in the study reported by Song P and collaborators [10] for the location of insulinomas in 12 patients, who were surgically treated. Tumor location was successfully determined in 12/12 patients by MDCT-IA (100%) compared to 9/11 by magnetic resonance imaging (81.8%), 4/7 by CT (57.1%) and 7/12 by ultrasound-enhanced contrast (CEUS) (58.3%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, MDCT-IA correctly located 100% of the lesions. [8][9][10] Endoscopic ultrasound is considered by several authors as a reference test for preoperative insulinoma localization, with a sensitivity of about 80% to 93%. It can even detect small tumors in the order of 5 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%