Valve or No Valve: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Casting Options for Pediatric Forearm Fractures

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of cast-related complications when using split or intact casts. A total of 60 patients aged 3 to 13 years with closed shaft or distal third radius and ulna fractures requiring reduction were recruited for this study. Patients underwent closed reduction under sedation and were placed into a long-arm fiberglass cast with 1 of 3 modifications: no valve, univalve, or bivalve. Patients were followed to 6 weeks after reduction or surgical treatment if required. The frequency of neurovascular injury, cast saw injury, unplanned office visits, and cast modifications, the need for operative intervention, and pain levels through the follow-up period were recorded. The results showed no incidents of compartment syndrome or neurovascular injury. Additionally, there were no differences between complications associated with cast type (P=.266), frequency of cast modifications (P=.185), or subsequent need for surgical stabilization (P=.361). Therefore, cast splitting following closed reduction of low-energy pediatric forearm fractures does not change clinical outcomes with respect to neurovascular complications, cast modifications, pain levels, or the need for repeat reduction. Consideration should be given to minimizing cast splitting after reduction of low-energy pediatric forearm fractures for practice efficiency and to potentially decrease saw-related injury. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):e849-e854.].

Cast Saw Burn Prevention: An Evidence-Based Review

“…31,32 Optimal limb positioning during cast cutting decreases the risk of blade-to-skin contact. 10,11,[31][32][33][34] To maximize the safety distance throughout the cut surface and use the effect of gravity, casts should be cut parallel with the force of gravity (Figure 2).…”